Back

A mapping review of good practices of participatory research for an impactful collaboration in disabilities studies

Corcuff, M.; Jribi, R.; Rodrigue, G.; Lamontagne, M.-E.; Raymond, E.; Archambault, P. S.; Routhier, F.

2024-09-19 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2024.09.18.24313890 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionParticipatory research is particularly relevant to understanding the challenges faced by people with disabilities (PWDs), as it actively involves them as partners, enabling methodologies to be better adapted to lived realities and producing more relevant and applicable results. By reducing systemic barriers and promoting inclusion, this approach improves understanding and consideration of the specific needs of PWDs in research. Yet, studies have identified hurdles associated with this approach, prompting questions about how organizations portray PWDs, the dynamics among research stakeholders, the distribution of decision-making power, and the actual impact of research on its partners. AimThis study aims to identify the factors that influence the process and results of participatory research in the field of disability studies MethodsWe conducted a mapping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and analysis the results according to the input-throughput-outcomes Bergen model ResultsThis study identifies partners skills and training, power sharing and benefits of active involvement as facilitators of participatory research. On the other hand, contextual challenges, and lack of guidance are reported as obstacles. ConclusionThis study provides insight into how the various facilitators and obstacles to participatory research and its different processes interact to produce positive, valid and rigorous results.

Published in Disability and Rehabilitation (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.