Back

Efficacy and Safety of Beta Blockers for Patients with Myocardial Infarction in the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Irtaza, A.; Junaid, M.; Saqlain, M.; Akram, A.; Khan, A.; Sarwari, A. S.; Ali, H.; Ahsan, S.; Ahmed, T.; Talib, T.; Ebad Ur Rehman, M.; Ahmad Cheema, H.; Ahmad, A.; Ur Rehman, W.; Wahab Arif, A.; S. Dani, S.

2024-09-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.18.24313821 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBeta-blockers are commonly prescribed to patients after MI. However, the evidence is based on studies conducted before the widespread use of PCI for treating MI. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate beta-blockers efficacy post-MI in the modern day and age. MethodsWe conducted our search using and one clinical trial registry to get RCTs and propensity-matched observational studies comparing the use of beta-blockers after MI to control in post-MI patients. The primary outcome of our analysis was the likelihood of all-cause mortality. ResultsOur analysis included 3 RCTs and 12 propensity-matched observational studies with a total study population of 102,794. Our results showed a statistically significant decrease in all-cause mortality in the beta-blocker group compared to the non-beta-blocker group (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.83; p= 0.001). However, this decrease was not observed when only RCTs were considered (RR 0.91). Beta-blockers were also found to reduce the risk of MI and heart failure with RR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-1.00; p=0.05) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97; p=0.02), respectively. ConclusionBeta-blockers effectively reduce mortality and decrease the risk of MI and heart failure without a significant increase in adverse effects. Thus, our findings support the contemporary use of beta blockers in post-MI patients. However, more long-term studies need to be done to determine the sustained benefits of beta blockers in the context of evolving cardiac care.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.