Human papillomavirus vaccination at the national level in Tunisia: a cost-effectiveness analysis using a comparative modeling study.
Laraj, O.; Benzina, B.; Gzara, A.; Kebir, A.; Abbas, K.; Ben Miled, S.
Show abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the most prevalent cancer diseases in women caused by persistent infection with one of 13 sexually transmitted high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types. Vaccination can significantly reduce the prevalence of this burden in low-middle income countries. However, HPV vaccination is not included in the Tunisian immunization program. Since the economic evaluation of HPV vaccines is crucial to inform public-health decisions, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that a cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination is conducted before nationwide introduction. This study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of incorporating different HPV vaccines into the national immunisation schedule in Tunisia. The potential health and economic impacts of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination were evaluated through comparative modelling analysis using two published static models (UNIVAC and Papillomavirus Rapid Interface for Modelling and Economics (PRIME)). Academic literature and anecdotal evidence were included on the demographic variables, cervical cancer incidence and mortality, treatment costs, vaccine delivery costs and other model parameters. The cost of vaccination, treatment costs saved, net costs, cases and deaths averted, life years saved, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) prevented, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were predicted and reported as primary outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated per disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted using the cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO). All HPV vaccines were very cost effective (with every disability-adjusted life-year averted costing less than the cost-effectiveness threshold). The analyses were done from a health system and societal perspective. Despite model differences, the PRIME and UNIVAC models yielded similar vaccine-impact estimates.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines for the Portuguese elderly population 95%
- Modeling the impact of COVID-19 vaccination in Lebanon: A call to speed-up vaccine roll out 94%
- The Societal Value of Vaccines: Expert-Based Conceptual Framework and Methods Using COVID-19 Vaccines as A Case Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Policies and strategies for HPV vaccination schedule completion in immunocompromised girls, including girls living with HIV: Qualitative insights from Eswatini, Malawi, and Uganda 94%
- Optimizing next-generation RSV prevention in Mali: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pediatric vaccination, maternal vaccination, and extended half-life monoclonal antibody immunoprophylaxis 93%
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccination Schedules in Malawi 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies to increase human papillomavirus vaccination uptake for adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Cost analysis of a nationwide typhoid conjugate vaccine campaign in Burkina Faso 93%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis 95%
- Projected health and economic effects of nonavalent versus bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination in preadolescence in the Netherlands 95%
- The indirect effect of the bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination program: an observational cohort study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.