Generative AI for Qualitative Analysis in a Maternal Health Study: Coding In-depth Interviews using Large Language Models (LLMs)
Qiao, S.; Fang, X.; Garrett, C.; Zhang, R.; Li, X.; Kang, Y.
Show abstract
Study ObjectivesThe coding of semi-structured interview transcripts is a critical step for thematic analysis of qualitative data. However, the coding process is often labor-intensive and time-consuming. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) presents new opportunities to enhance the efficiency of qualitative coding. This study proposed a computational pipeline using GenAI to automatically extract themes from interview transcripts. MethodsUsing transcripts from interviews conducted with maternity care providers in South Carolina, we leveraged ChatGPT for inductive coding to generate codes from interview transcripts without a predetermined coding scheme. Structured prompts were designed to instruct ChatGPT to generate and summarize codes. The performance of GenAI was evaluated by comparing the AI-generated codes with those generated manually. ResultsGenAI demonstrated promise in detecting and summarizing codes from interview transcripts. ChatGPT exhibited an overall accuracy exceeding 80% in inductive coding. More impressively, GenAI reduced the time required for coding by 81%. DiscussionGenAI models are capable of efficiently processing language datasets and performing multi-level semantic identification. However, challenges such as inaccuracy, systematic biases, and privacy concerns must be acknowledged and addressed. Future research should focus on refining these models to enhance reliability and address inherent limitations associated with their application in qualitative research.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and validating the Nepalese Abuse Assessment Screen (N-AAS) for identifying domestic violence among pregnant women in Nepal 94%
- Health worker acceptability of an HIV testing mobile health application within a rural Zambian HIV treatment programme 94%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing the Safe Motherhood Initiative: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of local physician’s perspectives on antibiotic self-medication during pregnancy in a low- and middle-income country 93%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 93%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 94%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 93%
- Comparing human vs. machine-assisted analysis to develop a new approach for Big Qualitative Data Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Iterative Development of a Mobile Phone Application to Support Community Health Volunteers during Cervical Cancer Screening in Western Kenya 92%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 92%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 94%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 92%
- A conversational agent for providing personalized PrEP support: Protocol for chatbot implementation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.