Back

Transcranial electrical brain stimulation modulates the vestibular system

Laakso, I.; Nissi, J.; Kangasmaa, O.

2024-09-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.13.612582 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques are widely used to modulate brain excitability, though their mechanisms remain unclear. ObjectiveWe aimed to demonstrate that an alternating current applied to several commonly used tES electrode montages can influence the vestibular system. MethodsBody-sway responses during alternating current stimulation at 4.6 or 4.8 Hz were measured in eight participants standing on a force platform. Sham and five active conditions, including common motor cortical tES electrode montages, were applied in a double-blind experiment. ResultsAll active conditions increased lateral body sway compared with sham at the stimulus frequency, with very large to huge effect sizes. The sway magnitude was proportional to the montage-specific electric field within the vestibular system, obtained from a computational model. The frequency and phase of the body sway were locked to the stimulus frequency and phase. An additional experiment in three participants showed that the sway response was the largest in the lower legs, similarly for both tES with a motor cortical electrode montage and an electrical vestibular stimulation montage. Together, the results suggest a direct effect of tES on the vestibular system. ConclusionUnwanted vestibular effects may interfere with the interpretation of tES studies across a wide range of typical tES frequencies and current intensities. HighlightsO_LIAlternating current stimulation produces a lateral body sway at the stimulation frequency. C_LIO_LILarger lateral electric field in the vestibular system produces a larger sway. C_LIO_LISeveral common tES montages can directly influence the vestibular system. C_LIO_LIUnwanted vestibular effects may complicate the interpretation of tES studies. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.