Low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation in stroke: An intensity escalation phase I safety and feasibility study
Huang, Z.; Charalambous, C. C.; Chen, M.; Kim, T.; Sokhadze, E.; Song, A.; Jung, S.-H.; Shekhar, S.; Feld, J.; Jiang, X.; Feng, W.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDLow-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (LIFUS) has recently emerged as a promising neuromodulation tool for certain neuropsychiatric diseases. However, its safety and feasibility in stroke patients remains unknown. Intensity is a critical safety parameter for LIFUS. We aimed to determine the maximum safe and tolerable intensity of LIFUS in stroke patients, and to explore its effect on upper-extremity motor learning and corticospinal excitability. METHODSSubjects with first-ever stroke participated in this Phase I study. We adopted the classic 3+3 dose-escalation paradigm to sham/0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 W/cm2 spatial-peak pulse-average intensity (ISPPA, estimated in-vivo transcranial value; LOW: sham/0, 1 and 2 W/cm2, HIGH: 4, 6 and 8 W/cm2). Stopping rules (dose limiting toxicities) were pre-defined: [≥]2nd-degree scalp burn, clinical seizures, [≥]20% topical apparent diffusion coefficient change, or participant discontinuation due to any reason. A 12-minute LIFUS was applied over the ipsilesional motor cortex while participants were concurrently practicing three blocks of motor sequence learning (MSL) task using the affected hand. We collected the occurrences of pre-defined adverse events, post-minus-pre improvements in MSL response time, and post-minus-pre differences in corticospinal excitability quantified by motor evoked potentials. RESULTSISPPA was escalated to 8 W/cm2 with eighteen stroke participants without meeting stopping rules. Compared to the LOW, the HIGH performed significantly better on the MSL (24.7{+/-}13.3% vs. 13.2{+/-}10.9%, p=0.01). Similarly, the HIGH also showed signs of increased corticospinal excitability (32.0{+/-}34.3% vs. 12.9{+/-}48.0%) but did not reach significance, p=0.53. CONCLUSIONSOur Phase I safety study suggests that a single session of 12-minute LIFUS up to 8 W/cm2 ISPPA is safe and feasible in stroke patients. Higher LIFUS intensities can induce greater MSL retention. The next logical step is to conduct a Phase II study to further test the efficacy of LIFUS and monitor its safety profiles in stroke patients. REGISTRATIONURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05016531
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Asymmetric transcallosal conduction delay leads to finer bimanual coordination 96%
- TMS with fast and accurate electronic control: measuring the orientation sensitivity of corticomotor pathways 96%
- Differential effects of theta-gamma tACS on motor skill acquisition in young individuals and stroke survivors: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain State-dependent Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Stroke Rehabilitation: A Proof of Concept Randomized Controlled Trial 97%
- Brain microstructural changes and fatigue after COVID-19 91%
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 94%
- Stroke recovery related changes in brain reactivity based on modulation of intracortical inhibition 94%
- Blood-brain barrier leakage in the penumbra is associated with infarction on follow-up imaging in acute ischemic stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconnecting the Hand and Arm to the Brain: Efficacy of Neural Interfaces for Sensorimotor Restoration after Tetraplegia 93%
- Deep brain stimulation improves symptoms of spasmodic dysphonia through targeting of thalamic sensorimotor connectivity 93%
- Precision Mapping of Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Positions Associated with the Microlesion Effect in Tourette Syndrome 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.