Backward Locomotor Treadmill Training on Walking and Balance Outcomes in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Awosika, O. O.; Drury, C.; Garver, A.; Boyne, P.; Sucharew, H.; Wasik, E.; Bhattacharya, A.; Dunning, K.; Khatri, P.; Kissela, B.
Show abstract
Background and PurposeWalking and balance impairments after stroke are a global health concern, causing significant morbidity and mortality. However, effective strategies for achieving meaningful recovery in the chronic stages are limited. Backward locomotor treadmill training (BLTT) is a novel walking rehabilitation protocol that is safe, feasible, and likely beneficial in stroke survivors; however, its efficacy has not been tested. This single-center, randomized, assessor-blind clinical trial aims to test the preliminary efficacy of BLTT compared to forward locomotor treadmill training (FLTT) on walking speed, symmetry, and postural stability. MethodsForty stroke survivors [BLTT (N=19), FLTT (N=21); mean age= 56.3 {+/-} 8.6 years; 53% Female; 30% Non-Hispanic Black] with mild-moderate walking impairment were enrolled. Participants underwent nine 30-minute BLTT or FLTT sessions over three weeks. The primary outcome was the mean change in the 10-meter walk test (10 MWT) at 24 hours post-training (24 hr POST). Secondary outcome measures were changes in spatiotemporal walking symmetry and postural stability during quiet standing at 24 hr POST. Retention was explored at Days 30- and 90 POST. ResultsWe report clinically meaningful ([≥] 0.16 m/s) improvements in overground walking speed at 24 hr POST, with retention up to Day 90 POST with BLTT and FLTT. However, contrary to our working hypothesis, no between-group differences in walking speed were observed. Nonetheless, we found that BLTT resulted in offline improvements in spatial symmetry and retention of subcomponents of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB), including the testing of proprio-vestibular integration up to Day 30 POST. ConclusionAmong chronic stroke patients with mild-moderate walking impairment, BLTT and FLTT both resulted in long-lasting and clinically meaningful improvement in walking speed. However, preliminary findings suggest that BLTT may better comprehensively target walking asymmetry and sensory systems processing and integration.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-site identification and generalization of clusters of walking impairment in individuals with chronic stroke and neurotypical controls 96%
- Impairments in proprioceptively-referenced limb and eye movements in chronic stroke 95%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 97%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 95%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speeding up, not slowing down, decreases the energy needed to control walking balance 94%
- Transtibial amputation increases the metabolic energy needed for stabilizing walking in the sagittal plane 94%
- Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Soleus Redistributes Lower-Limb Joint Work Distally in Young and Older Adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the optimal reactive balance training intensity in people with chronic stroke: study protocol for a randomized control trial 96%
- Simple within-stride changes in treadmill speed can drive selective changes in human gait symmetry 96%
- Mediolateral foot placement control can be trained: Older adults learn to walk more stable, when ankle moments are constrained 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.