Plasma proteome-based test (PROphetNSCLC) predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) independent of tumor programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB)
Brody, Y.; Yellin, B.; Sela, I.; Elon, Y.; Puzanov, I.; Nechushtan, H.; Zerkuch, A.; Gottfried, M.; Katzenelson, R.; Moskovitz, M.; Levy-Barda, A.; Lotem, M.; Leibowitz, R.; Lou, Y.; Dicker, A.; Gandara, D. R.; McGregor, K.
Show abstract
Despite the approval of PD-(L)1 inhibitors for the first-line treatment of all metastatic, driver-negative, non-small cell lung cancer patients (mNSCLC) in the United States since 2018, there still is a lack discerning biomarkers to predict which patients will derive significant benefit. Tumor expression of programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1), measured as the tumor proportion score (TPS), is a standard biomarker approved for the selection of initial therapy. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), a promising biomarker, thought to represent the tumors ability to engage the hosts immune system, has demonstrated clinical utility primarily in the context of immunotherapy monotherapy. PROphetNSCLC, a test developed through proteomic analysis and machine learning, provides a novel approach by capturing biological processes from both tumor and host. In a previously published study, PROphetNSCLC, was validated to correlate with the probability of clinical benefit, independent of but also complementary to PD-L1 expression levels predicting specific treatment-related survival outcomes. Utilizing available tumor TMB measurements from this investigation, we sought to assess the correlation between the PROphetNSCLC clinical benefit probability score and TMB measurement. PROphetNSCLC demonstrated a correlation with various outcomes from PD-(L)1 inhibitor treatment independent of TMB status, whereas TMB did not exhibit an association with outcomes. This finding emphasizes the significance in of novel systemic biomarkers in refining personalized treatment strategies for mNSCLC.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-progression survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with anti-PD-1/PDL-1 monotherapy: progression after durable clinical benefit versus primary resistance 93%
- KRAS mutations impact clinical outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer 93%
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating tumor fraction analyses with ultra-low pass whole genome sequencing predict response to chemoradiation and recurrence in stage IV small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a longitudinal case study 91%
- Phenotyping of lymphoproliferative tumours generated in xenografts of non-small cell lung cancer 91%
- Indole 3-acetate and response to therapy in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased Tryptophan, But Not Increased Glucose Metabolism, Predict Resistance of Pembrolizumab in Stage III/IV Melanoma 91%
- MMP2 As An Independent Prognostic Stratifier In Oral Cavity Cancers 91%
- Patient-derived tumor explant models of tumor immune microenvironment reveal distinct and reproducible immunotherapy responses 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 91%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 91%
- A three gene signature predicts response to selinexor in multiple myeloma 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic review of interleukin-2-based immunotherapies in clinical trials for cancer and autoimmune diseases 89%
- Establishment of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma molecular gradient (PAMG) that predicts the clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer 88%
- Prognostic Clinical and Biological Markers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease Progression: Validation and Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Analysis 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.