Associated factors of acculturation strategies and mental health outcomes among international students in China
Xiao, C.; Yan, J.; Li, H.; Ding, C.; Yu, B.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThere is an increasing number of international students in China. Acculturation strategies are the way students cope with different cultures, including integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization. This study aims to investigate the acculturation strategies and associated factors, and the effect of these strategies on mental health status among international students in China. Study designCross-sectional study. MethodsStudy data were collected from 567 international students attending universities in China. Acculturation strategies, acculturative stress, depressive symptoms were measured using reliable and valid scales. Linear and multinomial logistic regression were used for analysis. ResultsStudy findings revealed that integration (31.57%) was the most preferred acculturation strategy, followed by marginalization (28.92%), separation (21.87%) and assimilation (17.54%). Females were more likely to choose separation strategy than marginalization, while students with religions had higher likelihood to choose integration strategy. Students majoring in Literature/Art and liking their major were more likely to use assimilation strategy. Students with more studying time in weekdays and medium studying time in weekends were more likely to prefer integration strategy. Students with separation and integration strategy had higher acculturative stress. ConclusionsIntegration is the most popular acculturation strategy among international students in China. Students with separation and integration strategy had worse mental health status. Gender, major, religion, daily study time were significantly associated with the preference of acculturation strategies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of University Students’ Mental Health from the Perspective of Occupational Harmony 96%
- Fear among Syrians: a Proposed Cutoff Score and Validation of the Arabic Fear of COVID-19 Scale- A National Survey 96%
- Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 97%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 95%
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional survey of material deprivation and suicide-related ideation among Vietnamese technical interns in Japan in 2021 96%
- Quality of life and depressive symptoms among Peruvian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- COVID-19 knowledge, risk perception and precautionary behaviour among Nigerians: A moderated mediation approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 97%
- Psychiatric Manifestations and Associated Risk Factors among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria 94%
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increasing trends in mental health problems among Chinese young adolescents: results from repeated cross-sectional data in Changsha 2016-2020 95%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 94%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.