Back

Correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in Japan: A nationally-representative cross-sectional survey

Sato, Y.; Kawachi, I.; Saijo, Y.; Yoshioka, E.; Osaka, K.; Tabuchi, T.

2024-09-07 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.09.06.24313228 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in conspiracy theories worldwide. However, the prevalence of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs among Japanese has remained unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs in Japan using a nationwide survey of 28,175 residents aged 16-81 years old. MethodsA nationally representative, cross-sectional self-administered survey was conducted from September to October 2021. To assess the number of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, we used three questions from the Oxford Coronavirus Explanations, Attitudes, and Narratives Survey. Independent variables included general vaccine conspiracy beliefs, sociodemographic variables, information sources for COVID-19, trust in authorities, and fear of COVID-19. ResultsAfter applying sampling weights and imputation, the estimated prevalence of holding at least one COVID-19 conspiracy belief was 24.4%. From a linear regression model, several factors were independently associated with conspiracy beliefs. Notably, people with the lowest level of education (lower secondary school) endorsed fewer COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs (B -0.089, vs. upper secondary school). Furthermore, higher socioeconomic backgrounds-such as higher income, higher wealth, and regular employment-were associated with endorsing conspiracy beliefs. Additionally, only 37.3% of respondents trusted the government of Japan, but paradoxically, trust in the government was positively associated with conspiracy beliefs (B 0.175, vs. distrust). ConclusionsConspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 were prevalent in about a quarter of the Japanese population. Certain groups are more likely to endorse conspiracy beliefs, and targeting interventions towards these groups might be efficient in stemming the spread of conspiracy beliefs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
6
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
10
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
29
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%