Back

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during and 3 months after endovascular treatment in large-vessel occlusion stroke

Heiberg, A. V.; Lukassen, T. G.; Truelsen, T. C.; Borgwardt, H. G.; Benndorf, G.; Solling, C.; Schytz, H. W.; Moller, K.; Hansen, K.; Iversen, H. K.

2024-09-07 neurology
10.1101/2024.09.05.24313166 medRxiv
Show abstract

Acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion is effectively treated by endovascular treatment (EVT). However, treatment could be further refined by improved understanding of the pathophysiology, including dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA). Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) requires virtually no setup time and enables dCA investigation during EVT by measuring dynamic concentration in cortical oxygenated hemoglobin (OxyHb). We aimed to investigate dCA during EVT, before and after recanalization, and at follow-up (FU) after 24 hours and 90 days. We applied interhemispheric transfer function analysis (TFA) of low-frequency (LF) oscillations (0.07-0.2 Hz) in OxyHb that yields the dCA measures, gain and phase shift. LF phase shift increased immediately after recanalization for patients with milder symptom severity and at 24-hour FU for patients with more severe symptoms, but contralateral phase shift needs further investigation. We found higher LF gain in patients with favorable outcome and in patients starting intravenous thrombolysis before EVT. Adjusted for age, infarct size before EVT, and recanalization success, average LF gain predicted independent functional outcome, symptom severity and mortality at 90-day FU. In conclusion, interhemispheric TFA based on NIRS was feasible to assess dCA during EVT and provided insights that could potentially be applied in the development of individualized treatment. Clinical Trial RegistrationClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03738644. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03738644.

Published in Scientific Reports (predicted rank #8) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.