Perioperative albumin versus other fluids to prevent cardiac surgery associated kidney injury: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
Darlison, P.; Brown, A.; Serpa Neto, A.; Pakavakis, A.; Balachandran, M.; Shehabi, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundAcute kidney injury is a common complication following cardiac surgery. Albumin infusions have been proposed as an intervention that reduce the risk of this complication, but existing data have shown heterogenous results. The recent completion of two randomised controlled trial of Albumin infusions in cardiac surgical patients provides the opportunity to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to improve the precision of the estimated treatment effect of Albumin infusions in cardiac surgery. MethodsWe will conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials that have evaluated the use of peri-operative Albumin infusions compared to comparator fluids in patient undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery. We will conduct a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central from inception to 22nd August. The review will be conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. We will use a bayesian framework to estimate the treatment effect of albumin to prevent acute kidney injury defined according to the KDIGO criteria. ResultsThis systematic review has been prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024580170) and the formal search was conducted on 23rd August 2024. Title and abstract screening has commenced with data extraction to commence following the submission of the protocol. ConclusionThis systematic review will provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to inform clinicians about the role Albumin infusion in cardiac surgery.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for postpartum hypogalactia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- ‘Self-Management Intervention through Lifestyle Education for Kidney health’ (the SMILE-K study): protocol for a single-blind longitudinal randomised control trial with nested pilot study 94%
- Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
- The TARCiS statement: Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 93%
- Myocarditis and Pericarditis following COVID-19 Vaccination: Rapid Systematic Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Course 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 93%
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 93%
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta-analyses of nutrition research 93%
- Development of the Individual Participant Data (IPD) Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials using individual participant data 93%
- Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of balanced energy-protein supplementation provided to lactating women on maternal and infant outcomes: study protocol for a prospectively planned individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis 91%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 90%
- The Effect of Non-Pharmacologic Strategies on Prevention or Management of Intensive Care Unit Delirium: A Systematic Review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.