Exploring COVID-19 Pandemic Perceptions and Vaccine Uptake among Community Members and Primary Healthcare Workers in Nigeria: A Mixed Methods Study.
Bakare, A. A.; Sogbesan, A.; Herzig Van Wees, S. A.; Salako, J. A.; Bakare, D.; Olojede, O. E.; Akinsola, K.; Bakare, O. R.; Falade, A. G.; King, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted global health, with diverse perceptions about the disease and control measures, including vaccination. Understanding these perceptions can help inform public health and vaccination strategies in future outbreaks. This study examined community members and healthcare workers (HCWs) perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines in Nigeria, exploring factors influencing vaccine acceptance and hesitancy. MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study, combining quantitative survey data from 2,602 respondents (2,206 community members and 396 HCWs) with qualitative interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake and pandemic perceptions, while qualitative insights provided a deeper understanding of cultural perceptions, experiences, and hesitancy towards the COVID-19 vaccine. ResultsOverall, 43.4% of community members and 96.7% of HCWs received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine uptake was positively associated with increasing age, previous COVID-19 testing, male sex, government employment, and knowing someone diagnosed with COVID-19. Christianity was associated with lower uptake among community members. Perceptions varied, with 34.2% of community members and 17.7% of HCWs considering COVID-19 a death sentence, while 27.8% and 22.0% believed in African immunity, respectively. Hesitancy was driven by the fear of side effects (32.6%), pregnancy-related concerns (25.9%), and convenience-related issues (13.5%). Qualitative data found misinformation, mistrust, fear of adverse reactions, logistical challenges, and belief in the sufficiency of childhood vaccination fuelled hesitancy towards the COVID-19 vaccine. Despite this, general trust in vaccine safety and efficacy remained high, with most respondents willing to be vaccinated against other diseases and future outbreaks. ConclusionOur findings underscore the need for tailored public health strategies to address specific sociodemographic factors, individual perceptions, and logistical challenges to enhance COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Public health campaigns should focus on debunking myths, improving vaccine literacy, and leveraging the social influence of respected community leaders to build trust.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 98%
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 97%
- High confidence and demand for hepatitis E vaccine during an outbreak in Bentiu, South Sudan: A qualitative study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 97%
- Predictors of vaccination card retention in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana 97%
- Age-appropriate Vaccination and Associated Factors among Children Aged 12- 35 Months in Ethiopia: A Multi-Level Analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 97%
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 96%
- Adenovirus and RNA-based COVID-19 vaccines: perceptions and acceptance among healthcare workers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 97%
- Assessing the level and determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in Kenya 97%
- Community-based Case Studies of Vaccine Hesitancy and the COVID-19 Response in South Africa; The VaxScenes Study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.