Back

Novel derivatives of BCV and (S)-HPMPA inhibit orthopoxviruses and human adenoviruses more potently than BCV

Zhang, Y.; Wan, Y.; Guo, C.; Zhu, Z.; Qiu, C.; Lv, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, J.; Dai, F.; Cheng, X.; Deng, K.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.

2024-09-02 microbiology
10.1101/2024.08.30.610570 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BCV and tecovirimat are the only two chemical drugs that have been approved to treat smallpox and can be requested for Mpox treatment through a single-patient Emergency Investigational New Drug (EIND) application. Disappointedly, the efficacy of tecovirimat manifested in a recent clinical trial is far from being satisfactory, while the clinical efficacy of BCV is still inconclusive. Given that MPXV, variola and other emerging orthopoxviruses are posing serious threats to global health, it is urgent to develop better therapeutics. In this study, we tested the antiviral effects of three novel prodrugs, which were designed based on previously reported parent drugs, either (S)-HPMPC (cidofovir) or (S)-HPMPA. We found that one of the (S)-HPMPA-based prodrugs, ODE-(S)-HPMPA formate, exhibited significantly better anti-orthopoxvirus activity than BCV both in vitro and in vivo, which also inhibited human adenovirus type 2 and type 21 more efficiently than BCV. Most strikingly, the EC50 and EC90 of ODE-(S)-HPMPA formate against MPXV were more than 40-fold lower than those of BCV. In contrast, we observed that the anti-HSV-1 activities of the (S)-HPMPA-based prodrugs were less effective than those of the cidofovir-based prodrugs (BCV and BCV formate), especially in vivo. Moreover, we showed for the first time that cytidine and adenine analog combined therapies could provide mice with complete protection against lethal challenges of both vaccinia and HSV-1. Collectively, we propose that both the ODE-(S)-HPMPA formate and the BCV/ODE-(S)-HPMPA formate combination are worth further investigations for their potential clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antiviral Research
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
46.1%
2
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
4
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
5
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
6
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
9
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
11
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
12
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
13
Virus Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
19
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%