Back

Quantifying the health impact of crop breeding: Revisiting the Disability-Adjusted Life Years Approach

Lenaerts, B.

2024-08-26 health economics
10.1101/2024.08.26.24312574 medRxiv
Show abstract

Food interventions like industrial fortification and biofortification through crop breeding can help shift towards improved healthy diets, marking a significant stride in public health. Crop breeding contributes to a stable and healthy food supply by boosting agricultural yields and the micronutrient content of staples, which is pivotal for combating chronic and hidden hunger, especially in rural areas. Fortification enhances healthy diets by adding essential vitamins and minerals to commonly consumed foods, helping prevent nutrient deficiencies and support overall well-being. The burden of hunger and its consequences on health are increasingly quantified using the Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) approach, which merges years of life lost and years lived with disability, offering a comprehensive view of health impacts and aiding in resource allocation. A practical formula for quantifying the health impact of biofortification was introduced by Stein et al. (2005) and Zimmermann and Qaim (2004). This entails calculating the efficacy or relative reduction in hunger burden based on the current and post-intervention nutrient intake against the recommended dietary allowances. As data on consumption and recommended intake levels are variable and not robustly available, this paper proposes relying on relative estimates to bridge the data gaps and uncertainties, thus streamlining the quantification of fortifications and biofortifications impact on diets and overall health.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.3%
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
7
Malaria Journal
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.3%
11
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
13
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.9%
15
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
26
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%