Back

The Regulatory Logic of Planarian Stem Cell Differentiation

Perez-Posada, A.; Garcia-Castro, H.; Emili, E.; Vanni, V.; Arias-Baldrich, C.; Frölich, S.; van Heeringen, S. J.; Kenny, N. J.; Solana, J.

2024-08-26 systems biology
10.1101/2024.08.23.608747 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell type identity is determined by gene regulatory networks (GRNs), comprising the expression of specific transcription factors (TFs) regulating target genes (TGs) via binding to open chromatin regions (OCRs). The regulatory logic of differentiation includes factors specific to one or multiple cell types, functioning in a combinatorial fashion. Classic approaches of GRN discovery used perturbational data to elucidate TF-TG links, but are laborious and not scalable across the tree of life. Single cell transcriptomics has emerged as a revolutionary approach to study gene expression with cell type resolution, but incorporating perturbational data is challenging. Planarians, with their pluripotent neoblast stem cells continuously giving rise to all cell types, offer an ideal model to attempt this integration. Despite extensive single cell transcriptomic studies, the transcriptional and chromatin regulation at the cell type level remains unexplored. Here, we investigate the regulatory logic of planarian stem cell differentiation by obtaining an organism-level integration of single cell transcriptomics and single cell accessibility data. We identify specific open chromatin profiles for major differentiated cell types and analyse their transcriptomic landscape, revealing distinct gene modules expressed in individual types and combinations of them. Integrated analysis unveils gene networks reflecting known TF interactions in each type and identifies TFs potentially driving differentiation across multiple cell types. To validate our predictions, we combined TF knockdown RNAi experiments with single cell transcriptomics. We focus on hnf4, a TF known to be expressed in gut phagocytes, and confirm its influence on other types, including parenchymal cells. Our results demonstrate high overlap between predicted targets and experimentally-validated differentially-regulated genes. Overall, our study integrates TFs, TGs and OCRs to reveal the regulatory logic of planarian stem cell differentiation, showcasing that the combination of single cell methods and perturbational studies will be key for characterising GRNs widely.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
3
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
6
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.0%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
14
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
16
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
24
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%