Back

Evaluation of EUROSCORE II to determine the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study

Li, J.

2024-08-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.08.23.24312516 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsAortic stenosis (AS) was a prevalent heart valve disease whose morbidity and mortality can be reduced by aortic valve replacement (AVR) . EUROSCORE II assesses the perioperative mortality of severe AS patients undergoing AVR. This study explored EUROSCORE IIs prognostic value for long-term all-cause mortality of Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe AS and determined whether AVR affects this. MethodsAllocated to four groups following the EUROSCORE II (cut-off value of 4%) and whether performed AVR, 544 patients with moderate-to-severe AS were enrolled. Baseline data, Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and subgroup analysis were used to analyse the relationship between EUROSCORE II and participants all-cause mortality. Furthermore, ROC analysis determining the optimal cut-off value of EUROSCORE II was utilized. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 41.4 months, 177 (21.5%) participants reached the endpoint, with higher risks (EUROSCORE II [&ge;]4%) and no AVR exhibited significantly increased all-cause mortality rates compared to other groups (55.4% vs. 6.5%, 13.4%, and 32.7%; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed these findings (log-rank test P<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a 6.891-fold higher risk (HR, 6.891; 95% CI, 3.083-15.401; P<0.001) in patients without AVR with higher EUROSCORE II. The adjusted model (P<0.01) and subgroup analyses (without AVR P=0.001; with AVR P=0.029) supported EUROSCORE IIs prognostic value for all-cause mortality. The optimal EUROSCORE II cut-off for predicting all-cause mortality in patients without AVR was 2.23% (AUC 0.675). ConclusionsEUROSCORE II (cut-off value 4%) and AVR independently impact the long-term prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe AS.

Published in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.