Back

Characterization, enrichment, and computational modeling of cross-linked actin networks in trabecular meshwork cells

Li, H.; Harvey, D. H.; Dai, J.; Swingle, S. P.; Compton, A. M.; Sugali, C. K.; Dhamodaran, K.; Yao, J.; Lin, T.-Y.; Sulchek, T.; Kim, T.; Ethier, C. R.; Mao, W.

2024-08-21 cell biology
10.1101/2024.08.21.608970 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeCross-linked actin networks (CLANs) are prevalent in the glaucomatous trabecular meshwork (TM), yet their role in ocular hypertension remains unclear. We used a human TM cell line that spontaneously forms fluorescently-labeled CLANs (GTM3L) to explore the origin of CLANs, developed techniques to increase CLAN incidence in GMT3L cells, and computationally studied the biomechanical properties of CLAN-containing cells. MethodsGTM3L cells were fluorescently sorted for viral copy number analysis. CLAN incidence was increased by (i) differential sorting of cells by adhesion, (ii) cell deswelling, and (iii) cell selection based on cell stiffness. GTM3L cells were also cultured on glass or soft hydrogel to determine substrate stiffness effects on CLAN incidence. Computational models were constructed to mimic and study the biomechanical properties of CLANs. ResultsAll GTM3L cells had an average of 1 viral copy per cell. LifeAct-GFP expression level did not affect CLAN incidence rate, but CLAN rate was increased from [~]0.28% to [~]50% by a combination of adhesion selection, cell deswelling, and cell stiffness-based sorting. Further, GTM3L cells formed more CLANs on a stiff vs. a soft substrate. Computational modeling predicted that CLANs contribute to higher cell stiffness, including increased resistance of the nucleus to tensile stress when CLANs are physically linked to the nucleus. ConclusionsIt is possible to greatly enhance CLAN incidence in GTM3L cells. CLANs are mechanosensitive structures that affect cell biomechanical properties. Further research is needed to determine the effect of CLANs on TM biomechanics and mechanobiology as well as the etiology of CLAN formation in the TM.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.7%
10
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Cell Proliferation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
19
Cytoskeleton
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
22
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%