Treatment Outcomes and MRI Features of SUNA: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Verma, J.; Khanduja, S.; Etienne, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundTrigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), including short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA), are rare but debilitating headaches. The pathophysiology and optimal treatment of SUNA remain poorly defined, compounded by disparities in healthcare access. ObjectivesTo systematically review and analyze the effectiveness of treatment options, clinical outcomes, and brain MRI findings for SUNA, and to identify gaps in the current evidence base. MethodologyFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was performed across multiple databases. Data from 20 studies were analyzed, focusing on treatment efficacy, patient demographics, and MRI findings. Meta-analyses were conducted on treatment effectiveness, and bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. ResultsAmong 267 patients, the most commonly used treatments were lamotrigine (37.07%) and greater occipital nerve (GON) block (16.85%), showing effectiveness in over 50% of cases. Heterogeneity in lamotrigine effectiveness was high (Cochrans Q = 63.10, p-value < 0.0001, = 0.05). Lidocaine was effective for acute attacks (> 80%). Brain MRIs were mostly unremarkable, with some evidence suggesting neurovascular involvement. ConclusionLamotrigine and GON block are effective for SUNA, though treatment responses vary widely. MRI findings often lack abnormalities, suggesting a need for further research into the pathophysiology of SUNA. Larger, high-quality studies are needed to establish standardized treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safe Non-opioid and Non-barbiturate containing Acute Medication Combinations in Headache: An Exhaustive Approach Based on DrugBank Database 94%
- Behavioral Effects in Disorders of Consciousness Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials 91%
- Matrix and Graphical Representation of the Primary Headache Syndromes in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD3): A Basis for Automated Diagnosis and Analysis of Criteria. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- L-arginine and aged garlic extract for the prevention of migraine: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-II trial (LARGE trial) 94%
- Efficacy and safety of tirofiban following intravenous thrombolysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 90%
- Pain Reduction by Inducing Sensory-Motor Adaptation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS PRISMA): Protocol for a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective sleep quality and objective sleep physiology in migraineurs: a meta-analysis 92%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 92%
- Enhanced reflexive eye closure is mediated by ipRGC signals and is specific to migraine with visual aura 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical interventions in idiopathic intracranial hypertension - a comprehensive multi-center study of outcome and the role of treatment indication 92%
- Nusinersen in adult patients with 5q spinal muscular atrophy: a multicenter observational cohorts’ study 90%
- The effectiveness of Cenobamate in patients previously treated with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for drug resistant epilepsy 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of traditional medicine in treatment of migraine during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: an online survey 94%
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 92%
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Future Promises, Perils, and Practicalities 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.