Back

Plasma Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Wang, D.; Wu, L.; Feng, P.; Sun, Y.; Wu, D.; Xu, H.; Peng, H.; Li, H.

2024-08-15 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.08.14.24312020 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe temporal relationship between Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) is unclear. This study aimed to examine the temporal and probable causal relationship between them. MethodsA nested case-control study including 387 pairs of cases with HDP and healthy controls was conducted. Seven SCFAs levels in plasma samples drawn at 16-20 gestational weeks before HDP were assayed by GC/MS. The individual and joint associations of SCFAs with HDP were examined by logistic regression and weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression, respectively, followed by two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to test the underlying causality. ResultsThe univariate model found each interquartile increase in plasma valerate was associated with a 32.1% (OR=0.679, 95%CI=0.546-0.844) reduction in the risk of HDP, a 29.4%(OR=0.706, 95%CI=0.548-0.910) reduction in the risk of gestational hypertension (GH) and a 39.1% (OR=0.609, 95%CI=0.397-0.935) reduction in the risk of preeclampsia/chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia (PE/CH-PE). However, after adjustment for covariates, valerate was only associated with the risk of HDP (OR=0.699, 95% CI=0.516-0.946). In addition, plasma isobutyrate and hexanoate were associated with lower risks of HDP and PE/CH-PE. Furthermore, SCFAs co-exposure could reduce the risks of HDP and GH. MR showed that plasma acetate (OR=0.784, 95%CI=0.64-0.962), valerate (OR=0.575, 95%CI=0.363-0.909) and isovalerate (OR=0.642, 95%CI=0.428-0.963) had protective causal effects on GH. Meanwhile, plasma acetate had protective causal effects on PE (OR=0.746, 95%CI=0.6-0.927). ConclusionsThe study suggested it is necessary to appropriately increase SCFAs levels during pregnancy to reduce the risk of HDP.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.