Back

Rapid Parallel Visual Presentation Provides a New Perspective on Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin Chinese

Dunagan, D.; McLendon, J.; Jordan, T.; Chacon, D. A.

2024-08-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.08.13.607840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A fundamental question in language processing research is the degree to which the acceptability and ease of interpretation of a sentence are affected by the moment-by-moment memory encoding and retrieval processes needed to process it in time, vs. the properties of the linguistic representation itself, such as syntactic complexity. This manuscript investigates relative clauses, a crucial testing ground for theories of language processing, using parallel presentation, a technique in which the key elements of the target syntactic dependency are displayed to the visual system at the same time. Compared to serial presentation, parallel presentation mitigates the extent to which complex memory operations must be deployed to process the structure word-by-word. We report on an electroencephalography (EEG) experiment in Mandarin Chinese. Participants were presented with sentences which contained either a subject- or object-modifying subject- or object-extracted relative clause. Sentence presentation was split across two separate screens, with each screen being displayed only for 166ms on average. We find a behavioral preference for subject-extracted relative clauses and distinct EEG signatures for subject- and object-extracted relative clauses. Together, these results - on account of the parallel presentation scheme applied here - provide support for the independent contribution of linguistic representation in processing difficulty and the perspective that relative clause processing involves more than the factors that word by word accounts of this phenomenon would suggest. Further, the EEG result contributes to a growing body of electrophysiology literature attempting to illuminate the processing mechanisms deployed in the context of parallel presentation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.7%
3
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
6
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
7
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.3%
8
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
10
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
16
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
23
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
25
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%