Back

Survey: Accessibility of At-Home COVID-19 Tests for Users with Disabilities

Farmer, S.; Peagler, A.; Sheiner, R.; Martinez, A.; Razin, V.

2024-08-14 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.08.13.24311938 medRxiv
Show abstract

2Widespread access to over-the-counter at-home COVID-19 tests was a crucial component of the United States public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. For at-home testing to be effective, it is essential for the tests to be not only available but also usable and accessible to people with disabilities. In the present study, a survey was conducted to collect feedback about peoples experiences using over-the-counter COVID-19 tests, with an aim to identify barriers to the accessibility of COVID-19 tests for people with disabilities. Survey respondents self-identified as having little to no vision, low vision, or limited dexterity. The survey covered ten at-home COVID-19 test brands. For each test that a respondent had used, the survey included questions about whether the user was able to complete the test independently or whether they needed assistance, the ease of use for performing each part of the testing procedure, and any difficulties that the user encountered while using the test. The survey also included questions for each test regarding the use of mobile applications, digital instructions, and customer service. This report presents the results of nearly 400 responses to the accessibility survey. The results offer an improved understanding of accessibility barriers for at-home COVID-19 tests; designers of at-home diagnostic tests can apply this knowledge in order to improve the accessibility of over-the-counter COVID-19 tests and other at-home diagnostic tests to people with disabilities.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.7%
3
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
4
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
6
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
27
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%