Quantifying the impact of a broadly protective sarbecovirus vaccine in a future SARS-X pandemic
Whittaker, C.; Barnsley, G.; Olivera Mesa, D.; Laydon, D. J.; Tan, C. W.; Zhu, F.; Johnson, R.; Doohan, P.; Nedjati-Gilani, G.; Winskill, P.; Hogan, A.; Deol, A.; Mukandavire, C.; Hauck, K.; Lye, D. C. B.; Wang, L.-F.; Watson, O. J.; Ghani, A.
Show abstract
COVID-19 has underscored the need for more timely access to vaccines during future pandemics. This has motivated development of broad-spectrum vaccines providing protection against viral families, which could be stockpiled ahead of an outbreak and deployed rapidly following detection. We use mathematical modelling to evaluate the utility of a broadly protective sarbecovirus vaccine (BPSV) during a hypothetical SARS-X outbreak, including ring-vaccination, spatial targeting and mass vaccination of high-risk populations. Our results show BPSV ring- or spatially-targeted vaccination strategies are unlikely to contain a SARS-CoV-2-like virus but could contain or slow the spread of a SARS-CoV-1-like virus. Vaccination of high-risk populations with the BPSV ahead of a virus-specific vaccine (VSV) becoming available could substantially reduce mortality. For a 250-day VSV development timeline, BPSV availability reduced infection-related deaths in our model by 54% on average, though exact impact depended on the non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) scenario considered. We further show that BPSV availability enables shorter and less stringent NPIs to be imposed whilst limiting disease burden to that observed in the VSV-only scenario, though results are sensitive to vaccine properties (e.g. efficacy), health system capabilities (e.g. vaccination rollout speed) and the assumed timeline to VSV availability. Our modelling suggests that availability of a BPSV for those aged 60+ years could have averted 40-65% of COVID-19 deaths during the pandemics first year, with exact impact depending on the size of the maintained stockpile. Our work highlights significant potential impact of a BPSV, but that achieving this depends on investment into health systems enabling rapid and equitable access during future SARS-X pandemics.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing vaccine allocation for COVID-19 vaccines: potential role of single-dose vaccination 97%
- Estimating the potential impact and diagnostic requirements for SARS-CoV-2 test-and-treat programs 97%
- Possible future waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection generated by variants of concern with a range of characteristics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential impact of Omicron and future variants of concern on SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics and public health burden: a modelling study 97%
- The importance of sustained compliance with physical distancing during COVID-19 vaccination rollout 95%
- Adherence and sustainability of interventions informing optimal control against COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits of near-universal vaccination and treatment access to manage COVID-19 burden in the United States 96%
- Potential health and economic impact of paediatric vaccination using next generation influenza vaccines in Kenya: a modelling study 95%
- Projecting vaccine demand and impact for emerging zoonotic pathogens 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.