Back

Audio-Visual Stimulation Therapy for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

Tabacof, L.; Howard, R.; Bower, J.; Breyman, E.; Dewil, S.; Tosto-Mancuso, J.; Hanbury, R.; Carmouche, B.; Robberson, M.; Fry, A.; Putrino, D.

2024-08-13 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2024.08.12.24311569 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neuropathic Pain (NP) affects 10% of the general population, decreasing quality of life for millions of Americans and contributing to higher physical and mental health care costs. The most widely used treatments for NP involve medications that show limitations in efficacy and burdensome side effects. This randomized controlled trial explored the efficacy of a wearable Audio-Visual Stimulation neuromodulation device (Sana) as a novel intervention for chronic NP in 64 participants. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, after 8-weeks of daily use of the assigned Sana or Sham device, and after 4 weeks of discontinued use. For the main outcome (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory total), there were statistically significant improvements in the Active arm that were greater than those in the Sham Arm at Week-14 (Mean Difference = 10.04, p = 0.01). Both groups showed significant improvements at the end of the treatment period (Week-10), and the Active arm maintained this improvement after an additional 4 weeks of non-use, while the Sham arm almost returned to baseline (Active Change = 13.26, p <=0.001 | Sham Change = 3.22, p = 0.214). Participants in the Active arm had significant decreases in use of anxiolytic, opiate, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant medications compared to the Sham arm. The study provides strong evidence supporting the efficacy of a novel AVS Device in generating durable improvements in NP, with superiority over Sham at 14 weeks. The Sana device may also reduce the reliance on pain medications and is a safe and easy to use treatment option for patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.9%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.8%
4
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
11
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%