Back

The impact of urban vs rural environments on driving in ageing

Morrissey, S.; Jeffs, S.; Gillings, R.; Khondoker, M.; Fisher-Morris, M.; Manley, E.; Hornberger, M.

2024-08-13 public and global health
10.1101/2024.08.12.24310574 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectivesOlder rural drivers are more dependent on driving than urban drivers to maintain community mobility due to reduced availability of transportation alternatives. Yet it is not understood how cognition impacts driving mobility and road safety across urban vs rural settings. The present study therefore aimed to establish whether cognitive changes impacted driving mobility and road safety differently across rural and urban older drivers. Research Design and Methods969 older drivers (mean age: 71.01) were recruited for a prospective cohort study. Participants completed self-reported driving behaviour and road traffic incident (RTI) history questionnaires before completing an objective cognitive testing battery to establish global cognitive functioning; and were invited back to repeat the study procedure one-year later. ResultsWe find that older rural drivers have a greater driving mobility than older urban drivers and are less likely to reduce their driving mobility over time, as only urban residents with cognitive decline reduced their driving space. We further corroborate previous findings that RTI incidence is greater within urban areas and establish a distinct association between worse cognitive functioning and RTI risk solely in urban residents. Discussion and implicationsOverall, we show for the first time how the interaction of age-related cognitive changes with geographical settings impact driving mobility and road safety in urban and rural areas. This paves the way for informed policymaking and future research directions to navigate driving cessation and improved road safety in ageing.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.