Back

A systematic review of etiopathogenesis and treatment modalities for Moyamoya disease.

Chilikuri, G.; Job, A.; Vishwanathan, A.; Joshi, V.

2024-08-10 neurology
10.1101/2024.08.10.24311757 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMoyamoya disease (MMD) is a rare and chronic cerebrovascular disease characterized by progressive stenosis or occlusion of the blood vessels within the terminal intracranial aspect of the internal carotid artery and the circle of Willis, leading to the compensatory development of a fragile collateral vessel network at the base of the brain. These vascular features are responsible for the recurrent ischemic and/or hemorrhagic strokes seen in affected patients. Numerous studies have attempted to clarify the clinical features of Moyamoya, including its etiopathology and interventions. In recent years, the development of neuroimaging and surgical techniques has enhanced the understanding of MMD in patients. The purpose of this review is to discuss the hypothesized etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and the current possible treatment options available for Moyamoya disease. MethodsThe PRISMA protocol was utilized to perform an extensive literature search on Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for articles about etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation of Moyamoya disease and the treatment protocols followed in different parts of the world. A comprehensive analysis was also conducted for original articles to better understand the possible clinical presentation and diagnostic criteria used. ResultsBased on the literature review, the RNF213 mutation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and misregulation of growth factors in endothelial cells are the most acceptable etiopathogenesis of MMD via their involvement in neurovascular inflammation. ConclusionThe diagnostic test of choice is magnetic resonance angiography while direct & indirect revascularization surgeries are both effective and established treatments for managing symptoms of Moyamoya disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.