Back

Associations of Serum GDF-15 Levels with Physical Performance, Mobility Disability, Cognition, Cardiovascular Disease, and Mortality in Older Adults

Webber, K. R.; Patel, S.; Kizer, J.; Newman, A. B.; Psaty, B. M.; Eastell, R.; Cummings, S.

2024-08-08 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2024.08.07.24311629 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGrowth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a member of the TGF{beta} superfamily secreted by many cell types and found at higher blood concentrations as chronological age increases (1). Given the emergence of GDF-15 as a key protein associated with aging, it is important to understand the multitude of conditions with which circulating GDF-15 is associated. MethodsWe pooled data from 1,174 randomly selected Health ABC Study (Health ABC) participants and 1,503 Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) participants to evaluate the risk of various conditions and age-related outcomes across levels of GDF-15. The primary outcomes were (1) risk of mobility disability and falls; (2) impaired cognitive function; (3) and increased risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality. ResultsThe pooled study cohort had a mean age of 75.4 +/-4.4 years. Using a Bonferroni-corrected threshold, our analyses show that high levels of GDF-15 were associated with a higher risk of severe mobility disability (HR: 2.13 [1.64, 2.77]), coronary heart disease (HR: 1.47 [1.17, 1.83]), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR: 1.56 [1.22, 1.98]), heart failure (HR: 2.09 [1.66, 2.64]), and mortality (HR: 1.81 [1.53, 2.15]) when comparing the highest and lowest quartiles. For CHS participants, analysis of extreme quartiles in fully adjusted models revealed a 3.5-fold higher risk of dementia (HR: 3.50 [1.97, 6.22]). ConclusionsGDF-15 is associated with several age-related outcomes and diseases, including mobility disability, impaired physical and cognitive performance, dementia, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Each of these findings demonstrates the importance of GDF-15 as a potential biomarker for many aging-related conditions.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.