Back

Right Sepsis Classification- Must For Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Longitudinal Observational Study

Pilania, J.; Panda, P. K.; Das, A.; Chauhan, U.; Kant, R.

2024-08-07 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2024.08.07.24311603 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSepsis is a critical medical condition characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction triggered by a dysregulated response to infection. It poses a substantial global health burden, with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic costs, particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries. Effective management of sepsis relies on early recognition and appropriate intervention, underscoring the importance of accurate classification to guide treatment decisions. ObjectiveThis longitudinal observational study aimed to assess the distribution of sepsis categories and the use of empirical antibiotics classified by the WHO AWaRe system in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. The study also aimed to highlight implications for antimicrobial stewardship by examining the use of AWaRe group antibiotics and their correlation with sepsis classifications. MethodsA total of 1867 patients admitted with suspected sepsis were screened, with 230 meeting inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into different sepsis classes (Asepsis, Possible Sepsis, Probable Sepsis, Confirm Sepsis) and followed until discharge or Day-28. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed to assess sepsis categories and empirical antibiotic usage classified by Access, Watch, and Reserve categories according to the WHO AWaRe system. ResultsAmong the study cohort (mean age 40.70 {+/-} 14.49 years, 50.9% female), initial sepsis classification predominantly included Probable Sepsis (51.3%) and Possible Sepsis (35.7%), evolving to Asepsis (57.8%) upon final classification. Empirical antibiotic use showed a concerning predominance of Watch group antibiotics (92.5%), with Ceftriaxone (45.7%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (31.7%) being the most commonly prescribed. ConclusionThe dynamic nature of sepsis classification underscores the complexity of diagnosing and managing this condition. Accurate categorization is pivotal for clinical decision-making, optimizing antibiotic use, and combating antimicrobial resistance. The majority of the asepsis category was levelled as probable or possible sepsis and given antibiotics. The high reliance on Watch group antibiotics in empirical therapy signals a need for enhanced diagnostic strategies to refine treatment initiation, potentially reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Future efforts should focus on establishing sepsis classification checklists and promoting adherence to antimicrobial stewardship principles to mitigate the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
7
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
15
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%