Psychological Contributors to Pain Before, During, and After Endodontic Procedures: A Scoping Review
Sadr, A.; Gholamrezaei, A.; McNeilage, A. G.; Randall, C. L.; Kapos, F. P.; Peck, C. C.; Ashton-James, C. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundDespite an increasingly biopsychosocial approach to pain management in healthcare, the scope of research into the role of psychological factors in endodontic pain is unknown. ObjectivesThis study aimed to identify the scope of research into psychological contributors to pain associated with endodontic procedures, as a first step towards addressing psychological contributors to pain in clinical practice. MethodThis scoping review was conducted and reported according to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (extension for scoping reviews). The data search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL databases. For gray literature, we reviewed reference lists, medRxiv pre-prints, ProQuest and EBSCO theses, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane trials (via Ovid), and conference materials via Web of Science and Scopus (from inception to July 2023). Each record was screened by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted by one reviewer and cross-verified by a second reviewer. ResultsForty studies were included in the review. Twelve broad psychological constructs were evaluated in relation to pain for pre-procedural, procedural and post-procedural endodontics: pain expectancies, positive treatment expectancies, depression, anxiety, positive and negative mood (affect), beliefs about pain, desire for control of dental treatments, perceptions of dentists, somatic focus or awareness, pain coping strategies, personality, and psychiatric diagnoses. Pre-procedural pain was most frequently associated with anxiety. Procedural pain was consistently associated with expected pain. Post-procedural pain was associated with expected pain, depression, beliefs about pain, positive treatment expectations, and personality characteristics. ConclusionA variety of psychological factors have been investigated in relation to endodontic pain. Whilst associations between endodontic pain and psychological constructs were found, further research is needed to evaluate the strength of these associations, and the scope of evidence for interventions designed to address these psychological contributors to pain in dental practice. RegistrationThe search protocol was registered on Open Science Framework in 2021 (DOI number: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FSRJP).
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality assessment of studies included in Cochrane oral health systematic reviews 92%
- Neuroscientific Insights into the Built Environment: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Indoor Environmental Quality, Physiological Dynamics, and Psychological Well-Being in Real-Life Contexts 88%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and aptitude of early childhood, primary and/or secondary education teachers referred to first aid measures in dental trauma in the province of Seville (Spain.) 94%
- Cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging of calf muscle contraction in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy and healthy children: comparison of voluntary motion and electrically evoked motion 83%
- Different features of cholera in malnourished and non-malnourised children: analysis of 10-year surveillance data from a large diarrheal disease hospital in urban Bangladesh 82%
Similar papers in this journal
- Which surface treatment improves the long-term repair bond strength of aged methacrylate-based composite resin restorations? A systematic review and network meta-analysis 92%
- EGCG-modified bone graft to modulate the recruitment of M1 macrophage and alleviate the forming of fibrous capsule 87%
- Evaluation of RNA extraction free method for detection of SARS-COV-2 in salivary samples for mass screening for COVID-19 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.