Large scale serum proteomics identifies proteins associated with performance decline and clinical milestones in Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Ikelaar, N.; Barnard, A.; Eng, S.; Hosseini Vajargah, S.; Ha, K.; Kan, H.; Vandenborne, K.; Niks, E.; Walter, G.; Spitali, P.
Show abstract
Serum biomarkers are promising minimally invasive outcome measures in clinical studies in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). However, biomarkers strongly associated with clinical progression and predicting performance decline are lacking. In this study we aimed to identify serum biomarkers associated with clinical performance and able to predict clinical milestones in DMD. Towards this aim we present a retrospective multi-center cohort study including serum samples and clinical data collected in research participants with DMD as part of a natural history study at the University of Florida (UF) and real-world observations at Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) between 2009-2022. The 7K SomaScan(R) assay was used to analyse protein levels in in individual serum samples. Serum biomarkers predicted age at loss of ambulation (LoA), age at loss of overhead reach (OHR) and age at loss of hand to mouth function (HTM). Secondary outcomes were the association of biomarkers with age, corticosteroid (CS) usage, and clinical performance based on the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), 10 meter run velocity (10mrv), 6 minute walk (6MWT) and Performance of the Upper Limb (PUL2.0). A total of 716 serum samples were collected in 79 participants at UF and 74 at LUMC (mean[SD] age; 10.9[3.2] vs 8.4[3.4]). 244 serum proteins showed an association with CS usage in both cohorts independent of CS type and regimen, including MMP3 and IGLL1. 318 probes (corresponding to 294 proteins) showed significant associations with NSAA, 10mrv, 6MWT and/or PUL2.0 across both cohorts. The expression of 38 probes corresponding to 36 proteins such as RGMA, EHMT2, ART3, ANTXR2 and DLK1 was associated with risk of both lower and upper limb clinical milestones in both the LUMC and UF cohort. In conclusion, multiple biomarkers were associated with CS use, motor function and upper lower and upper limb disease milestones in DMD. These biomarkers were validated across two independent cohorts, increasing their likelihood of translation for use within the broader DMD population.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cholesterol metabolism is a potential therapeutic target in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy 95%
- Late-Stage Skeletal Muscle Transcriptome in Duchenne muscular dystrophy shows a BMP4-Induced Molecular Signature 94%
- Creatine/creatinine ratio and myostatin as biomarkers to monitor muscle function in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multistage Sequencing Strategy Pinpoints Many Novel and Candidate Disease Alleles for Orphan Disease Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy and Supports Gene Misregulation as its Pathomechanism 94%
- Prognostic Clinical and Biological Markers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease Progression: Validation and Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Analysis 94%
- Albumin-dependent and independent mechanisms in the syndrome of kwashiorkor 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Skeletal muscle biomarkers of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a large-scale, multi-cohort proteomic study 93%
- Fibroblast transcriptomics in molecular diagnostics of a comprehensive dystonia cohort 92%
- Co-opting MBNL-dependent alternative splicing cassette exons to control gene therapy in myotonic dystrophy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- miRNA biomarkers for diagnosis of ALS and FTD, developed by a nonlinear machine learning approach 93%
- Refining Muscle Morphometry Through Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis 92%
- SFPQ intron retention, reduced expression and aggregate formation in central nervous system tissue are pathological features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.