Exploring the impact of an artificial intelligence-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery on clinical outcomes: A protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Kitaguchi, D.; Fuse, N.; Wakabayashi, M.; Kosugi, N.; Ishikawa, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Hasegawa, H.; Takeshita, N.; Ito, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn the research field of artificial intelligence (AI) in surgery, there are many open questions that must be clarified. Well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to explore the positive clinical impacts by comparing the use and non-use of AI-based intraoperative image navigation. Therefore, herein, we propose the "ImNavi" trial, a multicenter RCT, to compare the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic surgery. MethodsThe ImNavi trial is a Japanese multicenter RCT involving 1:1 randomization between the use and non-use of an AI-based intraoperative image navigation system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The participating institutions will include three high-volume centers with sufficient laparoscopic colorectal surgery caseloads (>100 cases/year), including one national cancer center and two university hospitals in Japan. Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients. Patients aged between 18 and 80 years scheduled to undergo laparoscopic left-sided colorectal resection will be included in the study. The primary outcome is the time required for each target organ, including the ureter and autonomic nerves, to be recognized by the surgeon after its initial appearance on the monitor. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative target organ injuries, intraoperative complications, operation time, blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications within 30 days, postoperative male sexual dysfunction 1 month after surgery, surgeons confidence in recognizing each target organ, and the postoperative fatigue of the primary surgeon. DiscussionThe impact of AI-based surgical applications on clinical outcomes beyond numerical expression will be explored from a variety of viewpoints while evaluating quantitative items, including intraoperative complications and operation time, as secondary endpoints. We expect that the findings of this RCT will contribute to advancing research in the domain of AI in surgery. Trial registrationThe trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.html) on March 28th, 2023 under trial ID: UMIN000050701.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 95%
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial 95%
- The Impact of a Wireless Audio System on Communication in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Controlled Trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 95%
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 95%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Repeated Pediatric Laser Procedures: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 93%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and Internal Validation of Prediction Models for Pulmonary Hypertension Risk Assessment in a Cohort Inhabiting Tibet, China 90%
- The impact of lag time to cancer diagnosis and treatment on clinical outcomes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 89%
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.