Back

The cardiac output - cerebral blood flow relation is abnormal in most ME/CFS patients with a normal heart rate and blood pressure response during a tilt test.

van Campen, C. M.; Verheugt, F. W. A.; Rowe, P. C.; Visser, F. C.

2024-08-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.08.02.24311436
Show abstract

IntroductionOrthostatic intolerance is highly prevalent in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and is caused by an abnormal reduction in cerebral blood flow (CBF). In healthy controls (HC) regulation of CBF is complex and involves multiple mechanisms including cardiac output (CO), cerebral perfusion pressure, PO2 and PCO2, flow-metabolism coupling, and innervation of cerebral vessels. In ME/CFS multiple other mechanisms have also been identified. Aim of the studyWe previously found that both CBF and CO were reduced in ME/CFS patients during tilt testing, and we hypothesized that the relation between CBF and CO is abnormal and different from HC. In this retrospective study we analyzed this relation in a large group of patients. To compare the patient data with those of HC, we focused on patients with a normal heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) response to upright tilt. Also, the influence of clinical data was analyzed. MethodsA total of 534 ME/CFS patients and 49 HC underwent tilt testing with measurements of HR, BP, CBF, and CO. In 46 (9%) patients CO and CBF changes were in the normal range of HC, and in 488 (91%) an abnormal CO and CBF reduction was found. Resultspatients with a CO and CBF reduction in the range of HC had less severe disease and were more likely to be male. In patients with an abnormal CO and CBF reduction the slope of the regression line of CO versus CBF reduction was almost 1. A multiple regression analysis of the latter group, including patients with PetCO2 measurements (440/488: 90%) showed that the CO reduction for the major part predicted the CBF reduction, with a limited role for the PetCO2 reduction and the tilt duration. Other data did not add to the model. ConclusionsTwo different patient groups with a normal HR and BP response during the tilt were identified: those with a CO and CBF in the normal range of HC and those with an abnormal CO and CBF reduction during the tilt (91% of patients). The former group had milder disease and included more men. In the largest group of patients there was an almost 1:1 relation between the CO and CBF reduction, suggesting absence of compensatory vasodilation in the cerebral vasculature. This may be an appropriate target for clinical and therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 46%
11.1%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 2%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 16%
10.1%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.1%
7.5%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 1%
7.5%
6
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
8
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 5%
2.8%
10
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Journal of Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
12
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 1.0%
2.3%
14
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
17
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 14%
0.7%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 19%
0.7%
22
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
23
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Molecular Psychiatry
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 45%
0.7%
27
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 9%
0.7%