Back

A novel two-hit insomnia and inflammation rodent model of depressive-like behaviors

Mei, J.; Song, X.; Wang, Y.; Lyu, H.; Wang, G.; Chen, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C.; Xie, X.-h.; Chen, G.; Liu, Z.

2024-08-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.08.01.24311351 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSystemic inflammation and insomnia often co-occur in patients with depression. However, there is no suitable animal model to investigate the relationship between inflammation, sleep deprivation (SD), and depression. MethodsTo model interactions between insomnia, inflammation, and depression, we developed a novel "two-hit" rodent model of depressive-like behaviors using continuous SD followed by daily lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment. Control groups received SD, LPS, or sterile phosphate-buffered salinealone. The models validity was assessed at the cellular and molecular levels, with fluoxetine rescue applied to confirm model validity. ResultsThe model group demonstrated significant depressive-like behaviors that were rescued by fluoxetine treatment. Transcriptomic analysis revealed alterations in neuroinflammation and synaptic plasticity pathways within the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) of model rats. Western blotting validated alterations in key protein markers related to both processes, and immunofluorescence confirmed microglia and astrocyte activation, indicative of neuroinflammation. Additionally, transmission electron microscopy and Golgi-Cox staining revealed reduced synapse and dendritic spine density in the model group. Fluoxetine treatment reversed these structural changes. Sixteen genes associated with neuroinflammation and synaptic function were validated in human genetic studies by transcriptome-wide association analysis. ConclusionThis reliable two-hit model will be useful for investigating the roles of insomnia and inflammation in depression.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.