Impact Of The COVID-19 Pandemic On Adherence To Cardiovascular Medications Among Chronically Treated Patients In Alberta
McAlister, F. A.; Savu, A.; Chu, L. M.; Dover, D. C.; Kaul, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundSome studies have suggested that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted patient adherence with chronic therapies. We designed this study to explore whether cardiovascular drug adherence patterns changed in chronically treated patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsRetrospective cohort study examining drug dispensation data for all Alberta residents older than 18 years who were chronic users of at least one cardiovascular drug class, defined as receiving at least one prescription per annum for any agent in that drug class from March 15, 2017 to March 14, 2023 and 2 or more prescriptions within 365 days during either the pre-pandemic phase (March 15, 2018 to March 14, 2020) or the pandemic phase (March 15, 2020 to March 14, 2022). We calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) for each drug class per patient and used generalized estimating equation logistic regression to estimate the effect of time period (pandemic versus pre-pandemic) on achievement of good adherence (PDC>0.8) after adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities. ResultsWe evaluated 548,601 chronic users of at least one cardiovascular drug class between March 15, 2018 and March 14, 2022. The most frequently dispensed cardiovascular drug classes were ACEi/ARB (67.6%), statins (53.8%), beta-blockers (21.0%), and calcium channel blockers (20.7%); the most frequent diagnoses were hypertension (77.2%), diabetes mellitus (30.6%), and ischemic heart disease (19.6%), although 55.4% of the patients had Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of 0. The mean PDC for cardiovascular drug use in our cohort was 85.7% (median 93%) pre-pandemic and 87.0% (median 94%) during the pandemic. The proportion exhibiting good adherence (PDC>0.8) increased from 72.8% pre-pandemic to 75.4% during the pandemic (p<0.001). During the pandemic, users of cardiovascular drugs were more likely to exhibit good adherence (PDC>0.8) than they were in the pre-pandemic period: aOR ranged from 1.05 (95%CI 1.00-1.11) for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists to 1.16 (1.15-1.17) for statins. ConclusionChronic users of cardiovascular drugs exhibited higher adherence measures during the COVID-19 pandemic than prior to the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 95%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 93%
- Antihypertensive Medications and COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality: Population-based Case-Control Analysis in the United Kingdom 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 93%
- Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) as Novel Sources for Population-Based Post Marketing Surveillance of Medical Products: A Pilot Study from the FDA Sentinel Innovation Center 91%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 95%
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 92%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for 7,995 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 94%
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 92%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using quantitative bias analysis to adjust for misclassification of COVID-19 outcomes: An applied example of inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19 outcomes 89%
- Benzodiazepine Initiation Effect on Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Post Acute Ischemic Stroke 89%
- Characterization of Long COVID among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries using Claims Data 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.