Back

Association of quantified cardiovascular health with all-cause mortality in prediabetic patients

CHEN, A.; He, Q.; Wu, Y.; Ma, x.; Hu, L.; Wang, G.; Wang, Z.; Jia, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, J.

2024-08-02 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.07.31.24311259 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimWe aimed to explore the association between all-cause mortality and cardiovascular health (CVH) lifestyle interventions (as accurately quantified by Lifes essential 8) in prediabetic patients and to observe the dose-response relationship of the potential association. Methods and ParticipantsThe retrospective study included 5344 participants with prediabetes (age: 52.9 {+/-}15.8 years; (51.6% of men)). The Lifes essential 8 (LE8) score includes four health indicators and four health behaviors. We calculated Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRS) for all-cause mortality in subgroups of high CVH ([&ge;]80), low CVH ([&le;]50), and moderate CVH (50-79) based on the CVH quantification score of LE8, and explored the dose-response relationship of potential associations. We also performed separate analyses of the associations of all-cause mortality with each LE8 components and CVH health behaviors and indicators. ResultsIn the median follow-up period of 8.33 years, 658 deaths occurred. Compared with participants with high CVH, the covariate-adjusted HR(95%CI) for participants with moderate and low CVH were 2.55(1.23-5.31) and 3.92 (1.70-9.02), respectively. There was a dose-response relationship between the improvement of CVH status and the reduction of all-cause mortality (P-overall < 0.0001, P-nonliner = 0.7989). The improvement of CVH health behaviors has a more significant protective effect on patients with prediabetes than CVH health indicators. ConclusionHigh CVH status, quantified by LE8, has a significant effect on preventing mortality outcomes in prediabetic adults in the U.S.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.