Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in pancreatic cancer
Li, X.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, H.; Sun, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ge, Z.; Lin, S.; Li, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, W.; Chen, S.; Li, W.; Feng, F.; Lin, Z.; Ji, L.; Lai, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundPancreatic cancer is a serious threat to human health. Enhanced CT is widely used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, false-positive results on enhanced CT can lead to misdiagnosis and incorrect surgery or treatment, while false-negative results on enhanced CT can lead to missed diagnosis and delayed treatment. There is an urgent need to find convenient, cost-effective and non-invasive diagnostic methods to reduce the false-positive and false-negative rates of enhanced CT in pancreatic tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D in pancreatic cancer. Patients and methods62 subjects (malignant group, n=37; benign group, n=25) were finally included in this study. Remaining serum samples from the subjects were collected and tested by applying the YiDiXie all-cancer detection kit to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie-HS and YiDiXie-D, respectively. ResultsThe sensitivity of YiDiXie SS was 100% (95% CI: 90.6% - 100%) and its specificity was 68.0% (95% CI: 48.4% - 82.8%). This means that YiDiXie SS has extremely high sensitivity and high specificity in pancreatic tumors.YiDiXie-HS has a sensitivity of 94.6% (95% CI: 82.3% - 99.0%) and a specificity of 84.0% (95% CI: 65.3% - 93.6%). This means that YiDiXie-HS has high sensitivity and specificity in pancreatic tumors.YiDiXie-D has a sensitivity of 73.0% (95% CI: 57.0% - 84.6%) and its specificity is 92.0% (95% CI: 75.0% - 98.6%). This means that YiDiXie-D has high sensitivity and very high specificity in pancreatic tumors.YiDiXie SS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 88.6% - 100%) and a specificity of 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% - 94.1%) in patients with positive enhanced CT. This means that the application of YiDiXie SS reduces the false-positive rate of enhanced CT by 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0% - 94.1%) with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage. YiDiXie-HS had a sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI: 48.7% - 99.3%) and a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI: 62.4% - 92.5%) in enhanced CT-negative patients. This means that YiDiXie-HS reduces the false-negative enhancement CT rate by 84.2% (95% CI: 62.4% - 92.5%). YiDiXie-D has a sensitivity of 73.3%(95% CI: 55.6% - 85.8%) and a specificity of 83.3%(95% CI: 43.6% - 99.1%) in patients with positive enhancement CT. This means that YiDiXie-D reduces the false positive rate of enhanced CT by 83.3%(95% CI: 43.6% - 99.1%). YiDiXie-D had a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% CI: 35.9% - 94.9%) and a specificity of 94.7% (95% CI: 75.4% - 99.7%) in patients with negative enhanced CT. This means that YiDiXie-D reduces the false-negative rate of enhanced CT by 71.4% (95% CI: 35.9% - 94.9%) while maintaining high specificity. ConclusionYiDiXie -SS has very high sensitivity and high specificity in pancreatic tumors.YiDiXie -HS has high sensitivity and high specificity in pancreatic tumors.YiDiXie-D has high sensitivity and very high specificity in pancreatic tumors.YiDiXie SS significantly reduces pancreatic-enhanced CT with essentially no increase in delayed treatment of malignant tumors. The YiDiXie-HS significantly reduces the false negative rate of pancreatic enhanced CT. the YiDiXie -D significantly reduces the false positive rate of pancreatic enhanced CT or significantly reduces the false negative rate of pancreatic enhanced CT while maintaining a high level of specificity. the YiDiXie test is of great diagnostic value in pancreatic cancer, and it is expected to solve the problem of " too high a false positive rate" and " too high a false negative rate" of pancreatic enhanced CT. Clinical trial numberChiCTR2200066840.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 95%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 95%
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 94%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 93%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 94%
- Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data 94%
- A deep learning approach for Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue 96%
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNMT family induced down-regulation of NDRG1 via DNA methylation and clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer 93%
- Prognostic Analysis of Histopathological Images Using Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks 92%
- A machine learning approach for identification of gastrointestinal predictors for the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.