Back

Urinary Biomarkers for Disease Detection

Matov, A.

2024-08-11 oncology
10.1101/2024.07.30.24311186 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe current healthcare system relies largely on a passive approach toward disease detection, which typically involves patients presenting a "chief complaint" linked to a particular set of symptoms for diagnosis. Since all degenerative diseases occur slowly and initiate as changes in the regulation of individual cells within our organs and tissues, it is inevitable that with the current approach to medical care we are bound to discover some illnesses at a point in time when the damage is irreversible and meaningful treatments are no longer available. MethodsThere exist organ-specific sets (or panels) of nucleic acids, such as microRNAs (miRs), which regulate and help to ensure the proper function of each of our organs and tissues. Thus, dynamic readout of their relative abundance can serve as a means to facilitate real-time health monitoring. With the advent and mass utilization of next-generation sequencing (NGS), such a proactive approach is currently feasible. Because of the computational complexity of customized analyses of "big data", dedicated efforts to extract reliable information from longitudinal datasets is key to successful early detection of disease. ResultsHere, we present our preliminary results for the analysis of healthy donor samples and drug-naive lung cancer patients samples, for which we identify urinary biomarkers demonstrating that small RNAs can pass through the filtration by the kidneys. ConclusionsWe provide a proof-of-principle that it is possible to perform non-invasive health monitoring by sequencing of urinary small RNAs and that traces of neoplastic transformation originating in organs that are not adjacent to the urinary tract, like the lungs, can also be detected in urine.

Published in The Journal of Liquid Biopsy · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.