Social Determinants of Health and Lifestyle Risk Factors Modulate Genetic Susceptibility for Women's Health Outcomes
Guare, L. A.; Das, J.; Caruth, L.; Verma, S. S.
Show abstract
Womens health conditions are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Understanding these factors individually and their interactions is crucial for implementing preventative, personalized medicine. However, since genetics and environmental exposures, particularly social determinants of health (SDoH), are correlated with race and ancestry, risk models without careful consideration of these measures can exacerbate health disparities. We focused on seven womens health disorders in the All of Us Research Program: breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometriosis, ovarian cancer, preeclampsia, uterine cancer, and uterine fibroids. We computed polygenic risk scores (PRSs) from publicly available weights and tested the effect of the PRSs on their respective phenotypes as well as any effects of genetic risk on age at diagnosis. We next tested the effects of environmental risk factors (BMI, lifestyle measures, and SDoH) on age at diagnosis. Finally, we examined the impact of environmental exposures in modulating genetic risk by stratified logistic regressions for different tertiles of the environment variables, comparing the effect size of the PRS. Of the twelve sets of weights for the seven conditions, nine were significantly and positively associated with their respective phenotypes. None of the PRSs was associated with different age at diagnoses in the time-to-event analyses. The highest environmental risk group tended to be diagnosed earlier than the low and medium-risk groups. For example, the cases of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, and uterine fibroids in highest BMI tertile were diagnosed significantly earlier than the low and medium BMI groups, respectively). PRS regression coefficients were often the largest in the highest environment risk groups, showing increased susceptibility to genetic risk. This studys strengths include the diversity of the All of Us study cohort, the consideration of SDoH themes, and the examination of key risk factors and their interrelationships. These elements collectively underscore the importance of integrating genetic and environmental data to develop more precise risk models, enhance personalized medicine, and ultimately reduce health disparities.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Nulliparas 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in pregnant women: characterization of symptoms and syndromes predictive of disease and severity through real-time, remote participatory epidemiology 93%
- The Impact of Late-Career Job Loss and Genotype on Body Mass Index 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lifestyle Risk Score for aggregating multiple lifestyle factors: Handling missingness of individual lifestyle components in meta-analysis of gene-by-lifestyle interactions 92%
- An expanded analysis framework for multivariate GWAS connects inflammatory biomarkers to functional variants and disease 92%
- Polygenic Risk Modelling for Prediction of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rare coding variants in five DNA damage repair genes associate with timing of natural menopause 94%
- Pathway-specific polygenic scores substantially increase the discovery of gene-adiposity interactions impacting liver biomarkers 92%
- Ancestral diversity improves discovery and fine-mapping of genetic loci for anthropometric traits - the Hispanic/Latino Anthropometry Consortium 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clotting factor genes are associated with preeclampsia in high altitude pregnant women in the Peruvian Andes 92%
- A polygenic score-based approach to identify gene-drug interactions stratifying breast cancer risk 92%
- The Phenotype-Genotype Reference Map: Improving biobank data science through replication. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.