Back

Prognostic Nutritional Index in Risk of Mortality Following Fulminant Myocarditis

Doi, S.; Ishibashi, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Miyahara, D.; Sato, Y.; Kuwata, S.; Kida, K.; Izumo, M.; Onoue, K.; Kanaoka, K.; Saito, Y.; Akashi, Y. J.

2024-07-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.07.22.24310842 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFulminant myocarditis (FM) is an acute fatal inflammation disease, but its chronic phase is unclear. A Japanese nationwide registry evaluated the long-term mortality in FM patients using a prognostic nutritional index (PNI). Methods and ResultsThe retrospective cohort study included patients with clinically suspected or histologically proven FM available for PNI. PNI was assessed on admission and at discharge. We divided patients into two groups based on PNI at discharge (PNI [&le;]40 or PNI >40) and analyzed the change in PNI and mortality between the groups. Of 323 patients (the median [first-third quartiles] age of this cohort was 50 [37-64] years, and 143 [44%] were female), PNI [&le;]40 at discharge was in 99 (31%) patients. The median PNI in all patients increased from 41 (36- 46) on admission to 43 (39-48) at discharge (P<0.0001). Patients with PNI [&le;]40 had a lower event-free rate of death or rehospitalization with cardiovascular causes than those with PNI >40 (log-rank P=0.0001). When the PNI at discharge, age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, and Barthel index were evaluated in a multivariable Cox regression analysis, PNI [&le;]40 had an independent association with the death or rehospitalization with cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 2.14 [95% confidence interval, 1.14-4.01]; P=0.0289). ConclusionsOne-third of FM patients with low PNI at discharge had a higher risk of mortality than those with high PNI in the chronic phase. This study provokes clinical insight into the phenotype of chronic inflammation in FM and optimal follow-up management with low PNI.

Published in Scientific Reports (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.