Back

Assessing the clinical meaningfulness of slowing CDR-SB progression with disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease

Hartz, S. M.; Schindler, S. E.; Streitz, M.; Moulder, K.; Mozersky, J. M.; Wang, G.; Xiong, C.; Morris, J. C.

2024-07-16 neurology
10.1101/2024.07.16.24310511 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONFor many patients and caregivers, a major goal of disease-modifying treatments (DMT) for Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia is to extend independence in instrumental and basic activities of daily living (IADLs and BADLs). The goal of this study was to estimate the effect of treatments on the time remaining independent in IADLs and BADLs. METHODSParticipants at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center were selected who were potentially eligible for recent DMT trials: age [≥] 60 years at baseline, clinical diagnosis of very mild or mild AD dementia (global Clinical Dementia Rating(R) (CDR(R)) score 0.5 or 1), biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology, and at least one follow-up CDR assessment within 5 years. For IADLs, a subset of the Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) was examined that rated the degree of independence in the following: paying bills, driving, remembering medications and appointments, and preparing meals. For BADLs, the Personal Care domain of the CDR was used. Mixed-effects logistic and ordinal regression models were used to examine the relationship between CDR Sum Boxes (CDR-SB) and the individual functional outcomes and their components. The change in CDR-SB over time was estimated with linear mixed effects models. RESULTS282 participants were followed for an average of 2.9 years (SD 1.3 years). For 50% of individuals, loss of independence in IADLs occurred at CDR-SB>4.5 and in BADLs at CDR-SB>11.5. For individuals with a baseline CDR-SB=2, treatment with lecanemab would extend independence in IADLs for 10 months (95% CI 4-18 months) and treatment with donanemab in the low/medium tau group would extend independence in IADLs by 13 months (95% CI 6-24 months). DISCUSSIONIndependence in ADLs can be related to CDR-SB and used to demonstrate the effect of AD treatments in extending the time of independent function, a meaningful outcome for patients and their families.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.5%
2
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
20
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
25
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%