Screening and treatment time in school-based caries prevention: A randomized clinical trial
Barry Godin, T. J.; Hawthorne, G.; Shah, R.; Ruff, R. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundSchool-based caries prevention can increase access to dental services for underrepresented children and reduce the risk of tooth decay. MethodsThe CariedAway study was a longitudinal pragmatic randomized trial of silver diamine fluoride (SDF), fluoride varnish, dental sealants, and atraumatic restorations (ART) provided as part of a school caries prevention program. Using electronic health record software and reproducible procedures, we estimated the total time required to screen and treat program participants. Differences at initial treatment between interventions, provider (registered nurse and dental hygienist), dentition mix, and caries burden were determined using linear regression with cluster standard error estimation, and longitudinal effects were estimated using linear mixed effects models. ResultsA total of 7418 children were enrolled in the CariedAway trial, of which 7176 (97%) had viable data recorded for screening and treatment time. Overall treatment time for children receiving SDF and fluoride varnish was 283 seconds (SD=739), compared to 753 seconds (SD=2166) for children receiving dental sealants and ART. At the initial program visit, treatment time using SDF was significantly shorter than sealants and ART (B = -458.8, 95% CI = -650.1, -266.8) and treatment time decreased with each subsequent observation (B = -51.9, 95% CI = -68.4, -35.4). Treatment time significantly increased as the number of carious teeth per child increased, and there were no differences in treatment time using SDF between registered nurses and dental hygienists. ConclusionsThe sustainability of school-based caries prevention can be supported by robust data on program logistics and treatment time. These results can be leveraged by future school-based sealant and SDF programs to estimate the total reach and effectiveness of intended treatments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 91%
- Estimating the Per-Application Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Mupirocin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units 88%
- Pilot program for test-based SARS-CoV-2 screening and environmental monitoring in an urban public school district 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Silicone toothbrushes: A scoping review of an underutilized tool in global oral health 94%
- A Scoping Review of Deaf Awareness Programs in Health Professional Education 89%
- The impact of a demand-side sanitation and hygiene promotion intervention on sustained behavior change and health in Amhara, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and aptitude of early childhood, primary and/or secondary education teachers referred to first aid measures in dental trauma in the province of Seville (Spain.) 93%
- Language comprehension developmental milestones in typically developing children assessed by the new Language Phenotype Assessment (LPA) 84%
- Different features of cholera in malnourished and non-malnourised children: analysis of 10-year surveillance data from a large diarrheal disease hospital in urban Bangladesh 84%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.