Silence in physician clinical practice: a scoping review protocol
Kelly, M. A.; Rivera, S.; McClurg, C.; Sweeney, C.; Mosca, S.; McLeod, E.; Bennett, D.; Brown, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this review is to map, describe and conceptualize how silence is discussed within literature on interactions between physicians and patients, in clinical settings. MethodsWe will use the methodological framework of Arksey & OMalley, adapted by Levac et al and Joanna Briggs Institute. Empirical studies including quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, observational studies and reviews will be included. Commentaries, editorials, and grey literature will also be examined. The databases MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched. A two-part study selection strategy will be applied. First, reviewers will follow inclusion and exclusion criteria based on Population-Concept-Context framework to independently screen titles and abstracts. Next, full texts will be screened. Data will be extracted, collated, and charted to summarize methods, outcomes and key findings from the articles included. Expected results and implicationsThis scoping review will provide an extensive description of how physicians engage with silence in clinical settings. Findings will identify how silence is perceived in physician patient interactions, the roles it plays, what factors influence use of silence and guide development of educational initiatives on use of silence in clinical settings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
- Administration approaches of nursing assistants in hospitals: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions for burnout and well-being in homelessness staff: a systematic scoping review 94%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 94%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A core outcome set for adult general ICU patients 93%
- A Modified Delphi Consensus-based Comprehensive Checklist and Angoff Standard for Assessment of Competency in Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination 90%
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of an online training program for palliative care in India 92%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 92%
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The TARCiS statement: Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 92%
- Development and validation of the Symptom Burden Questionnaire™ for Long Covid: A Rasch analysis 90%
- Clinical Decision Support in Cardiovascular Medicine: Effectiveness, Implementation Barriers, and Regulation 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.