Back

The Safety, Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Intravitreal Avastin (Bevacizumab) Injection for the Treatment of Macular Edema at the University of Gondar Tertiary Eye Care and Training Center, NW Ethiopia

Gizachew, Y.; Tsegaw, A.; Wuletaw, T.

2024-07-10 ophthalmology
10.1101/2024.07.10.24310159
Show abstract

IntroductionThe current management of macular edema (ME) is intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs and this represents an important advance in the treatment of ME. Studies done in the western eye care settings have confirmed that intravitreal injection of Avastin is effective for the treatment of ME. However, data on this drugs efficacy and safety in African eye care settings are very scarce. ObjectiveTo assess the Safety and Effectiveness of intravitreal Bevacizumab (Avastin) injection for the treatment of Macular Edema (ME) due to retina vascular diseases at university of Gondar tertiary eye care and training center, NW Ethiopia. MethodA retrospective study was done on patients who were given intravitreal avastin (IVA) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and Neovascular Age related macular degeneration (AMD). The main outcome measure was visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) measured by spectral domain OCT. ResultsMedical records of 50 patients (66 eyes) were reviewed of which 46 (69.7%) were males and mean age of 54.2 years (range 20-80). The means of baseline VA and CMT were 1.0logMAR and 379.4 {micro}m respectively. At the end of follow up and after mean injection of 2.5 times per eye, the mean VA improved to 0.7 logMAR (p=0.001) and the mean CMT reduced to 295 {micro}m (p=0.0001). Baseline mean VA was significant prognostic factor for VA improvement (p=0.0001). Baseline mean CMT (P=0.007), number of injection (P=0.009) and diffuse macular edema (P=0.03) were significant factors for CMT reduction. ConclusionsIVA injection for ME edema due to retinal vascular diseases resulted in a significant improvement in mean VA (p=0.001) and CMT (p=0.0001) at the end of follow up. There was no any ocular or systemic complication of IVA injection.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 17%
1.7× avg
2
Eye
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
194× avg
3
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 0.9%
16× avg
4
British Journal of Ophthalmology
BMJ · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.5%
88× avg
5
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
102× avg
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.8%
39× avg
7
F1000Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 28 published papers
Top 0.1%
26× avg
8
Ophthalmology Science
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
58× avg
9
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 8%
3.3× avg
11
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 67%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 10%
2.6× avg
13
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 43%
1.4%
14
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 4%
4.4× avg
15
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 23%
0.7%
17
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Walter de Gruyter GmbH · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
18× avg