Back

Association of Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk score with concussion severity and recovery metrics

Dybing, K. M.; McAllister, T. W.; Wu, Y.-C.; McDonald, B. C.; Broglio, S. P.; Mihalik, J. P.; Guskiewicz, K. M.; Goldman, J. T.; Jackson, J. C.; Risacher, S. L.; Saykin, A. J.; Nudelman, K. N. H.

2024-07-11 sports medicine
10.1101/2024.07.10.24309042
Show abstract

Identification of genetic alleles associated with both Alzheimers disease (AD) and concussion severity/recovery could help explain the association between concussion and elevated dementia risk. However, there has been little investigation into whether AD risk genes associate with concussion severity/recovery, and the limited findings are mixed. We used AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) and APOE genotypes to investigate any such associations in the NCAA-DoD Grand Alliance CARE Consortium (CARE) dataset. We assessed six outcomes in 931 total participants. The outcomes were two concussion recovery measures (number of days to asymptomatic status, number of days to return to play (RTP)) and four concussion severity measures (scores on SAC and BESS, SCAT symptom severity, and total number of symptoms). We calculated PRS using a published score [1] and performed multiple linear regression (MLR) to assess the relationship of PRS with the outcomes. We also used t-tests and chi-square tests to examine outcomes by APOE genotype, and MLR to analyze outcomes in European and African genetic ancestry subgroups. Higher PRS was associated with longer injury to RTP in the normal RTP (<24 days) subgroup (p = 0.024), and one standard deviation increase in PRS resulted in a 9.89 hour increase to the RTP interval. There were no other consistently significant effects, suggesting that high AD genetic risk is not strongly associated with more severe concussions or poor recovery in young adults. Future studies should attempt to replicate these findings in larger samples with longer follow-up using PRS calculated from diverse populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 0.1%
48.2%
2
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
based on 31 papers
Top 0.5%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 32%
5.6%
4
Aging Cell
based on 21 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
5
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 4%
2.0%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
2.0%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
8
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
based on 31 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 88%
1.7%
12
European Journal of Epidemiology
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 11%
1.6%
14
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
16
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 3%
0.5%
18
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
0.5%
19
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 36%
0.5%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 45%
0.5%
22
SLEEP
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Neurobiology of Aging
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
0.5%
24
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 54%
0.5%
25
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 12%
0.5%
26
Molecular Psychiatry
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
0.5%
27
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.5%