Back

Tall women with breast cancer have poorer survival than short women

Lehrer, S.; Rheinstein, P. H.

2024-07-09 oncology
10.1101/2024.07.08.24310089
Show abstract

BackgroundTall women are more likely to develop breast cancer (BC). High Mobility Group AT-Hook 1(HMGA1), an oncofetal protein, plays a role in the progression of breast cancer. Non-coding sequences proximal to HMGA1 contain variants associated with 4.83 cm taller height. In the current study, we used UK Biobank data to examine the relationship of HMGA1 to height, risk, and prognosis of women with breast cancer. MethodsOur analysis included all subjects with invasive BC that occurred either before or after participant enrollment and were recorded in the UK Biobank database using self-reported data and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD10, ICD9). We divided the subjects into three previously described three height groups: Short (< 155 cm), Medium (155 cm to 175 cm), Tall (> 175 cm). We analyzed the HMGA1 SNP rs41269028, a single nucleotide intron variant, C > T, minor allele frequency 0.044. SNP rs41269028 was previously evaluated in subjects with diabetes. ResultsHeight of 9583 women with BC homozygous for the HMGA1 SNP rs41269028 major allele was 162.29 cm {+/-} 6.18. Height of 944 women with BC who were carriers or homozygotes (CT + TT) of the minor allele T was 162.88 cm {+/-} 6.001. This difference was significant (p = 0.005). The effect of height group on survival was significant (p = 0.032, log rank test). Tall women had the poorest survival. The effect of HMGA1 SNP rs41269028 genotype on BC risk (p = 0.602) and survival (p = 0.439, log rank test) was insignificant. ConclusionWe conclude that HMGA1 influences height, but we were unable to demonstrate that HMGA1 is related to increased incidence or poor prognosis of tall women with breast cancer. We did find that tall women with breast cancer have poorer survival than short women. Our finding that tall women have a worse prognosis is important because it could help the oncologist decide, along with other prognostic factors, whether adjuvant therapy is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 1%
12.6%
2
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 46%
11.1%
4
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 0.3%
8.3%
5
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 0.5%
5.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 0.6%
4.5%
7
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 55%
2.8%
10
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 24%
2.5%
12
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 12%
2.4%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Clinical Epigenetics
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
16
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 45%
1.3%
17
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
18
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
19
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
24
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
27
Journal of Personalized Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%