Back

MitoFit: Evaluation of a Mitochondrial Fitness Science Communication Intervention for Aging Adults

Maxwell, C. A.; Patel, M. R.; Boon, J. T.; Grubbs, B.; Dietrich, M. S.; Dunavan, J.; Knickerbocker, K.

2024-07-07 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2024.07.04.24309859
Show abstract

A key driver that leads to age-associated decline and chronic disease is mitochondrial dysfunction. Our prior work revealed strong community interest in the concept of mitochondrial fitness that led to development of a video based science communication intervention to prompt behavior change in adults aged 50+. AimTo conduct formative and summative evaluations of MitoFit, an instructional, biologically based communication intervention aimed at improving physical activity (PA) in older adults, aged 50+. MethodsPhase 1 formative evaluation- Community-dwelling older adults (N=101), rated the acceptability, appropriateness and helpfulness of our MitoFit video series, titled, "How to Slow Down Aging Through Mitochondrial Fitness." ([≥] 4 out of five on a Likert-scale survey). Phase II summative evaluation- A subgroup of phase I participants (N=19) participated in a 1-month MitoFit intervention prototype to evaluate intervention and data collection feasibility ([≥] 70% completion). ResultsPhase I: Participants (mean age: 67.8 [SD 8.9]; 75% female) rated the MitoFit videos as acceptable (agree: 97%-100%), appropriate (agree: 100%) and helpful (agree: 95%-100%) to support adaptation and continued work on our novel approach. Phase II: Participants (mean age: 71.4 [SD 7.9]; 72% female) demonstrated MitoFit competencies (obtaining pulse, calculating maximum and zone 2 heart rate, demonstration of exercises). At one-month post-instruction, 13 participants (68.4%) had completed a self-initiated daily walking/exercise plan and submitted a daily activity log. Feasibility scores ranged from 89.4% to 94.7%. Fifteen participants (78.9%) stated an intention to continue the MitoFit intervention. ConclusionMitoFit was enthusiastically embraced, and is a cost-effective, scalable, and efficacious intervention to advance with community-dwelling older adults.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 30%
15.7%
2
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
based on 19 papers
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
BMC Geriatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
7.7%
5
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
6.5%
6
Age and Ageing
based on 27 papers
Top 0.4%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
based on 12 papers
Top 0.2%
5.4%
8
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.6%
9
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
3.0%
10
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
11
Aging Cell
based on 21 papers
Top 0.8%
2.5%
12
GeroScience
based on 22 papers
Top 0.7%
2.5%
13
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 34%
2.5%
14
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
15
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 77%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 21%
0.8%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
based on 81 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Stroke
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 19%
0.7%
25
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%