Back

A diverse high-fibre plant-based dietary intervention improves gut microbiome composition, gut symptoms, energy and hunger in healthy adults: a randomised controlled trial.

Creedon, A. C.; Bernard, H.; Amati, F.; Segata, N.; Wallace, M.; Arre, A.; Smith, H. A.; Platts, A.; Bulsiewicz, W. J.; Bermingham, K. M.; Capdevila Pujol, J.; Piperni, E.; Roomans Ledo, A.; Johnson, C.; Caro, C.; Karimjee, N.; Linenberg, I.; Giordano, F.; Davies, R.; Wolf, J.; Asnicar, F.; Spector, T.; Berry, S. E.

2024-07-03 nutrition
10.1101/2024.07.02.24309816 medRxiv
Show abstract

Diets low in diverse fibre-rich plant foods are a major factor in the rise of chronic diseases globally. The BIOME study (NCT06231706) was a 6-week, parallel design randomised controlled trial in 399 healthy adults in the UK, investigating a simple dietary intervention containing 30+ whole-food ingredients high in plant polyphenolic compounds, fibre and micronutrients. Participants were randomised to the primary intervention (prebiotic blend; 30g/d) or control (bread croutons; 28g/d; isocaloric functional equivalent) or a daily probiotic (L. rhamnosus). The primary outcome was change in favourable and unfavourable microbiome species compared to control, secondary outcomes included changes in blood metabolites, gut symptoms, stool output, anthropometric measures, subjective hunger, sleep, energy and mood. A crossover test meal challenge sub-study was conducted in 34 participants, investigating postprandial glucose responses, subjective hunger, satiety and mood. In the 349 male and female participants (mean age 50yrs) included in the analysis (intention-to-treat), self-reported adherence was high (> 98% for all treatments). Following the prebiotic blend, significant improvements were seen in the change and ranking of favourable and unfavourable species as well as beta diversity (weighted-UniFrac measure), but not in the control or probiotic group. There were significantly greater improvements in self reported indigestion, constipation, heartburn, flatulence and energy, following the prebiotic vs control, and hunger following the prebiotic vs probiotic. Addition of the prebiotic to a high carbohydrate test meal challenge resulted in significant improvements in subjective hunger, fullness, and energy (3h incremental area under the curve). No other significant differences between groups were observed. This prebiotic blend is a simple dietary strategy that benefits gut microbiome composition, gut symptoms and self-reported energy and hunger. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=131 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24309816v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b26c20org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d8dd09org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1978cc5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9ae6a3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Gut Microbes
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
14
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
18
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
21
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
24
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
27
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%