Increased BMI associated with decreased breastfeeding initiation in Million Veteran Program participants
Lankester, J.; Guarischi-Sousa, R.; Hilliard, A. T.; VA Million Veteran Program, ; Shere, L.; Husary, M.; Crowe, S.; Tsao, P. S.; Rehkopf, D. H.; Assimes, T. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundBreastfeeding has established health benefits for infants and has been associated with postpartum improved maternal cardiometabolic health in the long term. However, breastfeeding prevalence is also inversely associated with prepartum body mass index (BMI), and both are linked to socioeconomic factors. We sought to clarify the relationship between prepartum BMI and breastfeeding prevalence in the Million Veteran Program (MVP), a large-scale genetic epidemiology study of US Veterans. MethodsWe included data from parous female participants with available breastfeeding information from the MVP cohort. BMI at enrollment as well as earliest BMI available were extracted from the electronic health record, and polygenic scores (PGS) for BMI were calculated for the subset of participants with genotype data. We modeled whether participants breastfed an infant for one month or more (BF[≥]1M) as a function of BMI at enrollment (n=20,293); earliest BMI where available pre-pregnancy (n=532); and PGS for BMI among genetically inferred European ancestry participants (n=11,568). We conducted Mendelian randomization for breastfeeding using PGS as an instrumental variable. ResultsA higher BMI predicted a lower likelihood of BF[≥]1M in all analyses. A +5 kg/m2 BMI pre-pregnancy was associated with a 24% reduced odds of BF[≥]1M, and a +5 kg/m2 genetically predicted BMI was associated with a 17% reduced odds of BF[≥]1M. ConclusionsBMI predicts a lower likelihood of BF[≥]1M. Given the high success of breastfeeding initiation in supportive environments combined with potential health benefits to both infant and mother, pregnant Veterans with prepartum elevated BMI may benefit from additional postpartum breastfeeding support.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Nulliparas 94%
- A longitudinal causal graph analysis investigating modifiable risk factors and obesity in a European cohort of children and adolescents 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in pregnant women: characterization of symptoms and syndromes predictive of disease and severity through real-time, remote participatory epidemiology 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 94%
- The effect of maternal BMI, smoking and alcohol on congenital heart diseases: a Mendelian randomization study 94%
- Maternal smoking during pregnancy and type 1 diabetes in the offspring: A nationwide register-based study with family-based designs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A structural mean modelling Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the lifecourse effect of adiposity: applied and methodological considerations 91%
- Analyses using multiple imputation need to consider missing data in auxiliary variables 91%
- Combining longitudinal data from different cohorts to examine the life-course trajectory 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The influence of genetic predisposition and physical activity on risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the nuMoM2b cohort 93%
- Association of assisted reproductive technology with offspring growth and adiposity from infancy to early adulthood 91%
- The pandemic, COVID-19 disease and perinatal health 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Twin pair analysis uncovers novel links between DNA methylation, mitochondrial DNA quantity and obesity 93%
- Multi-omic brain and behavioral correlates of cell-free fetal DNA methylation in macaque maternal obesity models 92%
- Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.