Awake prone positioning effectiveness in moderate to severe COVID-19 a randomized controlled trial.
Nguyen Thanh, P.; Du, D. H.; Hai, H. B.; Nguyen, N. T.; Khoa, L. D. V.; Khanh, L. T. T.; Tran, L. H. B.; Linh, N. T. M.; Van, C. T. C.; Thao, D. P.; Trinh, N. T. D.; Kieu, P. T.; Truong, N. T.; Hoang, V. T.; Ngoc, N. T.; Vien, T. T. D.; Ly, V. T.; Khoa, T. D.; Beane, A.; Anibal, J. T.; Thwaites, G.; Geskus, R. B.; Clifton, D.; Dung, N. T. P.; Kestelyn, E.; Glover, G.; Tan, L. V.; Yen, L. M.; Tung, N. L. N.; Dung, N. T.; Thwaites, C. L.
Show abstract
ObjectivesWe evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of awake-prone positioning (APP) in a randomised controlled trial, using a dedicated APP implementation team and wearable continuous-monitoring devices to monitor position and oximetry. MethodsThe trial was performed at a tertiary level hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, recruiting adults ([≥]18 years) hospitalised with moderate or severe COVID-19 and receiving supplemental oxygen therapy via nasal/facemask systems or high-flow nasal canulae. Participants were randomized (1:1) to standard care or APP. The primary outcome was escalation of respiratory support within 28 days of randomisation. ResultsNinety-three patients were enrolled between March 2022 and March 2023; 80 (86%) had received [≥]2 doses of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. Significantly greater mean daily APP times were achieved in those allocated to APP, although most did not achieve the target 8 hours/day. We did not detect significant differences in the primary outcome (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.40-1.78, p=0.67) or secondary outcomes, including intubation rate and 28-day mortality. Particpants reported prone positioning was comfortable, although almost all preferred supine positioning. No adverse events associated with the intervention were reported. ConclusionsAPP was not associated with benefit, but was safe. Continuous monitoring with wearable devices was feasible and acceptable to patients. Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT05083130 FundingWellcome Trust Grant 089276/B/09/7, 217650/Z/19/Z and FDCO/Wellcome Trust 225437/Z/22/Z
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 94%
- The clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes, including experiencing of patient safety events, associated with admitting patients to single rooms compared with shared accommodation for acute hospital admissions. A narrative synthesis systematic literature review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 94%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 94%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doxycycline for the prevention of progression of COVID-19 to severe disease requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission: a randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial (DOXPREVENT.ICU) 95%
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 94%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prone positioning of patients with moderate hypoxia due to COVID-19: A multicenter pragmatic randomized trial [COVID-PRONE] 95%
- Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study) 91%
- Clinical Decision Support in Cardiovascular Medicine: Effectiveness, Implementation Barriers, and Regulation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 94%
- The angiotensin type 2 receptor agonist C21 restores respiratory function in COVID19 - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial 92%
- The implementation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.