Back

Gut microbial profiling of COVID-19 patients in Uganda

Kateete, D. P.; Lubega, C.; Galiwango, R.; Nasinghe, E.; Mbabazi, M.; Jjingo, D.; Elliott, A.

2024-06-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.06.28.601197 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWhile COVID-19 spread globally, the role of the gut microbiota in patient outcomes has remained an area of exploration especially in resource limited settings. This study aimed to comprehensively profile the gut microbiome among Ugandan COVID-19 patients and infer potential implications. MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs, stool, clinical and demographic data were collected from COVID-19 confirmed cases at the COVID-19 isolation and treatment centers in Kampala and Entebbe, Uganda, during the first and second waves of the pandemic in Uganda (i.e., 2020 and 2021, respectively). SARS-CoV-2 presence in the swab samples was confirmed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR assays. 16S rRNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing was performed on the DNA extracted from the stool samples, followed by bioinformatics analysis. Machine learning was used to determine microbes that were associated with disease severity. ResultsWe observed varied gut microbial composition between COVID-19 patients and healthy controls. Potentially pathogenic bacteria such as Klebsiella oxytoca, Salmonella enterica and Serratia marcescens had an increased presence in COVID-19 disease states, especially severe cases. Enrichment of opportunistic pathogens, such as Enterococcus species, and depletion of beneficial microbes, like Alphaproteobacteria, was observed between mild and severe cases. Machine learning identified age and microbes such as Ruminococcaceae, Bacilli, Enterobacteriales, porphyromonadaceae, and Prevotella copri as predictive of severity. ConclusionThese findings suggest that the microbiome plays a role in the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in African patients. The shift in abundance of specific microbes can moderately predict severity of COVID-19 in this population. Their direct or indirect roles in determining severity should be investigated further for potential therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.3%
2
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
7
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
11
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
17
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
23
Gut Microbes
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
25
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%